Breitling says they will have 2 co-existing currencies at the same time and they will both raise in value percentage wise at the same time (for about 3 years).

by **Ponee** Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:51 pm

Guru Brietling  The articles that are coming out are talking about deleting the zeros and adding value to the currency…This is exactly what the CBI has stated that they will have 2 co-existing currencies at the same time and they will both raise in value percentage wise at the same time (for about 3 years). That's not the RV we are looking for in that definition…it comes somewhere else. What makes the currency you and I hold important and what the clues we're looking at?

If you look at how they got rid of the Saddam Hussain currency (or Swiss Dinar)…they simply said they were going to retire the notes and it took them 6 months.  Is that what they said they are going to do [here]? No…that's the first clue. #2 is How are they going to add value to the currency? It's a liquidity problem…there were 9 Billion notes and 30 Trillion Dinar…the CBI kept stating one of these days we are going to lower the note count and guess what they did? Started lowing the note count…It went from 9 Billion notes to 6 billion notes to 4 billion notes and everyone understands the trend…that's how we know the currency you and I have is ripe for a reevaluation and it's going to grow percentage wise with the new currency coming out.

…The info I got is that it can go all the way up to $3. But they can do whatever they want. They are going to come out with a new currency that doesn't have the 3 zeros on it.  Does that mean we will not make any money…no, they said they would coexist for 3 years. If they had no intention revaluing the currency there would be NO REASON AT ALL to reduce the note count…they could just do what they did the first time and retired the Saddam currency. What did they do? They said they're retired, you've got 6 month to exchange and that's it.  They are not doing that are they? No, they are lowing the note count.