Latest topics
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT - DINAR, CORP., INC.
+2
Ponee
Cindy813
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT - DINAR, CORP., INC.
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES
TRADING COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
DINAR, CORP., INC.;
MY MONEX, INC., a Nevada Corporation; and
HUSAM TAYEH
Defendants,
THEODORE S. HUDSON, II; and
MY MONEX, INC., an Alabama Corporation
Relief Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT
FILED UNDER SEAL
SEALED ORDER GRANTING COMMISSION’S
EX PARTE
STATUTORY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trad
ing Commission (“Commission”), has filed a
Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other
Relief, and has moved, pursuant to Section
6c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “A
ct”), 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1
(a) (2012) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fe
d. R. Civ. P.”) 65(b), for an
in camera
,
ex parte
statutory
restraining order enjoining Defe
ndants Dinar Corp, Inc. (“DCI”
), My Monex, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (“Monex NV”) and Husam Tayeh (“
Tayeh”) (collectively the “Defendants”) and
Relief Defendants Theodore S. Hudson, II (“H
udson”) and My Monex, Inc., an Alabama
corporation (“Monex AL”) (collectively the “R
elief Defendants”), from destroying, altering,
or disposing of, or refusing to permit authori
zed representatives of the Commission to inspect
and copy any books or records or other doc
uments, including el
ectronically stored
Case 1:15-cv-00538-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 11
2
information (“ESI”), and further enjoinin
g Defendants and Relief Defendants from
withdrawing, transferring, rem
oving, dissipating, or disposing of
any funds, assets or other
property. The Court has considered the plead
ings, declarations, exhibits, and memorandum
filed in support of the Commissi
on’s motion for a statutory restra
ining order, and finds that:
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the part
ies and over the subject matter of this
action pursuant to Section 6c of
the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1 (2012),
and Section 2(c)(2) of the
Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2(c)(2) (2012).
2.
Venue lies properly within this District pursuant to Section 6c(e) of the Act, 7
U.S.C. 13a-1(e) (2012) in that the acts or pr
actices described in the Complaint took place
and/or are taking place
within this District.
3.
There is good cause to believe that De
fendants have engaged in, are engaging
in and are about to engage in certain unl
awful conduct, including, but not limited to: a
fraudulent scheme involving the offering of agr
eements, contracts or transactions in off-
exchange foreign currency (“forex”) on a levera
ged, margined, or financed basis, totaling
more than $27 million, to retail customers who we
re not eligible contract customers (“ECPs”)
and that do not result in
actual delivery of forex within two (2
) days of the transaction date(s);
the failure of DCI and Monex NV
to register with the Comm
ission as registered foreign
exchange dealers (“RFED”); and the failure of
Tayeh to register with the Commission as an
associated person (“AP”) of the RFEDs DCI a
nd/or Monex NV, in conn
ection with financed
retail forex transactions as described in Section 2(c)(2)(C)(i) of the Act, 7 U.S.C.
§ 2(c)(2)(C)(i) (which are subj
ect to the anti-fraud provisions
of Section 4b(a)(2)(A) and (C)
of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6b(a)(2)(A), (C),
pursuant to Sections 2(c)(2)(C)(ii)(I) and
2(c)(2)(C)(iv) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2(c)(2)(C)(i
i)(I), 2(c)(2)(C)(iv)), in
violation of Sections
Case 1:15-cv-00538-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 11
http://www.iqncalls.com/DinarCorp_Order.pdf
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES
TRADING COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
DINAR, CORP., INC.;
MY MONEX, INC., a Nevada Corporation; and
HUSAM TAYEH
Defendants,
THEODORE S. HUDSON, II; and
MY MONEX, INC., an Alabama Corporation
Relief Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT
FILED UNDER SEAL
SEALED ORDER GRANTING COMMISSION’S
EX PARTE
STATUTORY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trad
ing Commission (“Commission”), has filed a
Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other
Relief, and has moved, pursuant to Section
6c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “A
ct”), 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1
(a) (2012) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fe
d. R. Civ. P.”) 65(b), for an
in camera
,
ex parte
statutory
restraining order enjoining Defe
ndants Dinar Corp, Inc. (“DCI”
), My Monex, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (“Monex NV”) and Husam Tayeh (“
Tayeh”) (collectively the “Defendants”) and
Relief Defendants Theodore S. Hudson, II (“H
udson”) and My Monex, Inc., an Alabama
corporation (“Monex AL”) (collectively the “R
elief Defendants”), from destroying, altering,
or disposing of, or refusing to permit authori
zed representatives of the Commission to inspect
and copy any books or records or other doc
uments, including el
ectronically stored
Case 1:15-cv-00538-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 11
2
information (“ESI”), and further enjoinin
g Defendants and Relief Defendants from
withdrawing, transferring, rem
oving, dissipating, or disposing of
any funds, assets or other
property. The Court has considered the plead
ings, declarations, exhibits, and memorandum
filed in support of the Commissi
on’s motion for a statutory restra
ining order, and finds that:
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the part
ies and over the subject matter of this
action pursuant to Section 6c of
the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1 (2012),
and Section 2(c)(2) of the
Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2(c)(2) (2012).
2.
Venue lies properly within this District pursuant to Section 6c(e) of the Act, 7
U.S.C. 13a-1(e) (2012) in that the acts or pr
actices described in the Complaint took place
and/or are taking place
within this District.
3.
There is good cause to believe that De
fendants have engaged in, are engaging
in and are about to engage in certain unl
awful conduct, including, but not limited to: a
fraudulent scheme involving the offering of agr
eements, contracts or transactions in off-
exchange foreign currency (“forex”) on a levera
ged, margined, or financed basis, totaling
more than $27 million, to retail customers who we
re not eligible contract customers (“ECPs”)
and that do not result in
actual delivery of forex within two (2
) days of the transaction date(s);
the failure of DCI and Monex NV
to register with the Comm
ission as registered foreign
exchange dealers (“RFED”); and the failure of
Tayeh to register with the Commission as an
associated person (“AP”) of the RFEDs DCI a
nd/or Monex NV, in conn
ection with financed
retail forex transactions as described in Section 2(c)(2)(C)(i) of the Act, 7 U.S.C.
§ 2(c)(2)(C)(i) (which are subj
ect to the anti-fraud provisions
of Section 4b(a)(2)(A) and (C)
of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6b(a)(2)(A), (C),
pursuant to Sections 2(c)(2)(C)(ii)(I) and
2(c)(2)(C)(iv) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2(c)(2)(C)(i
i)(I), 2(c)(2)(C)(iv)), in
violation of Sections
Case 1:15-cv-00538-WKW-TFM Document 8 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 11
http://www.iqncalls.com/DinarCorp_Order.pdf
Cindy813- Active Member
- Posts : 29
Join date : 2015-08-03
Ponee- Admin
- Posts : 38267
Join date : 2011-08-09
Re: CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT - DINAR, CORP., INC.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES
TRADING COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
DINAR, CORP., INC.;
MY MONEX, INC., a Nevada Corporation;
and HUSAM TAYEH
Defendants,
THEODORE S. HUDSON, II; and
MY MONEX, INC., an Alabama Corporation
Relief Defendants
***********************************
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT
FILED UNDER SEAL
_______________________________________
SEALED ORDER GRANTING COMMISSION'S EX PARTE STATUTORY RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission"), has filed a
Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Relief, and has moved, pursuant to Section
6c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the "Act"), 7 U.S.C. $ 13a-1(a) (2012) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P.") 65(b), for an in camera, ex parte statutory
restraining order enjoining Defendants Dinar Corp, Inc. ("DCI"), My Monex, Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("Monex NV") and Husam Tayeh ("Tayeh") (collectively the "Defendants") and
Relief Defendants Theodore S. Hudson, II ("Hudson") and My Monex, Inc., an Alabama
corporation ("Monex AL") (collectively the "Relief Defendants"), from destroying, altering,
or disposing of, or refusing to permit authorized representatives of the Commission to inspect
and copy any books or records or other documents, including electronically stored
information ("ESI"), and further enjoining Defendants and Relief Defendants from
withdrawing, transferring, removing, dissipating, or disposing of any funds, assets or other
property. The Court has considered the pleadings, declarations, exhibits, and memorandum
filed in support of the Commission's motion for a statutory restraining order, and finds that:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and over the subject matter of this
action pursuant to Section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. $ 13a-1 (2012), and Section 2(c)(2) of the
Act, 7 U.S.C. $ 2(c)(2) (2012).
2. Venue lies properly within this District pursuant to Section 6c(e) of the Act, 7
U.S.C. 13a-1(e) (2012) in that the acts or practices described in the Complaint took place
and/or are taking place within this District.
3. There is good cause to believe that Defendants have engaged in, are engaging
in and are about to engage in certain unlawful conduct, including, but not limited to: a
fraudulent scheme involving the offering of agreements, contracts or transactions in offexchange foreign currency ("forex") on a leveraged, margined, or financed basis, totaling
more than $27 million, to retail customers who were not eligible contract customers ("ECPs")
and that do not result in actual delivery of forex within two (2) days of the transaction date(s);
the failure of DCI and Monex NV to register with the Commission as registered foreign
exchange dealers ("RFED"); and the failure of Tayeh to register with the Commission as an
associated person ("AP") of the RFEDs DCI and/or Monex NV, in connection with financed
retail forex transactions as described in Section 2(c)(2)(C)(i) of the Act, 7 U.S.C.
$ 2(c)(2)(C)(i) (which are subject to the anti-fraud provisions of Section 4b(a)(2)(A) and (C)
of the Act, 7 U.S.C. $ 6b(a)(2)(A), (C), pursuant to Sections 2(c)(2)(C)(ii)(I) and
2(c)(2)(C)(iv) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. $$ 2(c)(2)(C)(ii)(I), 2(c)(2)(C)(iv)), in violation of Sections
2(c)(2)(C)(iii)(I)(aa), and 4b(a)(2)(A), (C) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. $$ 2(c)(2)(C)(iii)(I)(aa) and
6b(a)(2)(A), (C) (2012), and Commission Regulation 5.3(a)(6)(i) and (ii), 17 C.F.R.
$5.3(a)(6)(i) and (ii) (2014). In addition, there is good cause to believe that some of the
Defendants' customers' funds have been and/or are currently held in one or more accounts in
the name of, or under the control of, Relief Defendants, who have no legitimate interest in or
entitlement to these funds received as a result of Defendants' unlawful conduct.
4. There is good cause to believe that immediate and irreparable damage to the
Court's ability to grant effective final relief for customers in the form of monetary redress will
occur from the sale, transfer, assignment, or other disposition by Defendants and/or Relief
Defendants of assets or records unless Defendants and Relief Defendants are immediately
restrained and enjoined by Order of the Court.
5. There is good cause for the Court to impose a restraining order prohibiting
Defendants and Relief Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and other
persons who are in active concert or participation with them, from withdrawing, transferring,
removing, dissipating, or disposing of any funds, assets, or other property owned, controlled,
managed, or held by or on behalf of, or for the benefit of Defendants and/or Relief
Defendants.
6. There is good cause for entry of an order prohibiting Defendants and Relief
Defendants, and their agents, servants, employees, assigns, attorneys, and persons in active
concert or participation with the Defendants and/or Relief Defendants, including any
successor thereof, from destroying records and/or denying agents of the Commission access to
inspect and copy records to ensure that Commission representatives have immediate and
complete access to all such books and records.
7. Absent the entry of this statutory restraining order, the Defendants and Relief
Defendants are likely to dissipate or transfer assets and destroy business records.
8. This is a proper case for granting an ex parte statutory restraining order to
preserve the status quo, protect public customers from loss and damage, and enable the
Commission to fulfill its statutory duties, therefore the Court orders as follows:
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Order, the following definitions apply:
9. The term "assets" means any legal or equitable interest in, right to, or claim to,
any real or personal property, whether individually or jointly, directly or indirectly controlled,
and wherever located, including but not limited to: chattels, goods, instruments, equipment,
fixtures, general intangibles, effects, leaseholds mail or other deliveries, inventory, checks,
notes, accounts (including, but not limited to, bank accounts and accounts at other financial
institutions), credits, receivables, lines of credit, contracts (including spot, futures, options, or
swaps contracts), insurance policies, and all cash, wherever located, whether in the United
States or outside the United States.
10. The term, "document" is synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the
usage of the term in Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a), and includes, but is not limited to, all writings or
printed matter of any kind, including without limitation: records, correspondence,
memoranda, notes, rolodexes, address books, diaries, statistics, e-mail, letters, telegrams,
minutes, contracts, reports, studies, checks, statements, receipts, returns, summaries,
pamphlets, books, prospectuses, interoffice or intra-office communications, telephone
message slips, offers, notations of conversations, bulletins, drawings, plans, computer
printouts, computer input or output, teletypes, facsimiles, invoices, worksheets, ledger books,
books of accounts, and all drafts, alterations, modifications, changes and amendments of any
of the foregoing. The term "document" also includes graphs, charts, photographs,
phonographic record, audio and video recordings, computer records, and other data
compilations from which information can be obtained or translated, if necessary, through
detection devices into reasonable usable form. The term "document" also refers to each and
every document in your actual or constructive possession, including but not limited to: (i) all
documents within your custody or control of any of your present or former agents, employers,
employees, partners, and (ii) all documents which you have a legal or equitable right to obtain
from another person. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within
the meaning of the term. A document also includes the file and folder tabs associated with
each original and copy.
11. "Defendants" refers to DCI, Monex NV and Tayeh, and/or any person insofar
as he or she is acting in the capacity of an officer, agent servant, employee, and/or attorney of
the Defendants and any person or entity who receives actual notice of this Order by personal
service or otherwise insofar as he, she or it is acting in concert or participation with the
Defendant(s).
12. "Relief Defendants" refers to Hudson and Monex AL, and/or any person
insofar as he or she is acting in the capacity of an officer, agent servant, employee, and/or
attorney of the Relief Defendants and any person or entity who receives actual notice of this
Order by personal service or otherwise insofar as he, she or it is acting in concert or
participation with the Relief Defendant(s).
RELIEF GRANTED
I. RESTRAINING ORDER PROHIBITING THE TRANSFER, REMOVAL, DISSIPATION AND DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
13. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Statutory Restraining Order (doc. no. 5) is GRANTED as set forth herein.
14. The Defendants and Relief Defendants and their agents, servants, employees,
assigns, attorneys, person and/or entity in active concert or participation with them, including
any successor thereof, and persons in active concert or participation with them, who receive
actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are immediately restrained and
enjoined, except as otherwise ordered by this Court, from directly or indirectly: transferring,
selling, alienating, liquidating, encumbering, pledging, leasing, loaning, assigning,
concealing, dissipating, converting, withdrawing, or otherwise disposing of any assets,
wherever located, including Defendants' and/or Relief Defendants assets held outside the
United States; provided however, that if Defendants DCI, Monex NV and/or Tayeh have or
control any accounts in which there are any open trading positions in contracts, agreements,
or transactions in commodity futures, options on commodity futures, and/or forex or options
relating thereto, Defendants shall forthwith close out or liquidate any and all such open
positions.
15. Defendants and Relief Defendants are restrained and enjoined from directly or
indirectly opening or causing to be opened any safe deposit boxes titled in the name of, or
subject to, access by Defendant(s) and/or Relief Defendants.
16. The assets affected by this Order shall include both existing assets and assets
acquired after the effective date of this Order.
II. MAINTENANCE OF AND ACCESS TO BUSINESS RECORDS
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
17. The Defendants, Relief Defendants, and their agents, servants, employees,
assigns, attorneys, and person in active concert or participation with them, including any
successor thereof, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise,
are restrained from directly or indirectly destroying, mutilating, erasing, altering, concealing
or disposing of, in any manner, directly or indirectly, any documents that relate to the
business practices or business or personal finances of any Defendant and/or Relief Defendant.
III. BOND NOT REQUIRED OF PLAINTIFF
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
18. As Plaintiff is an agency of the United States of America which has made a
proper showing under Section 6c(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 13a-1(b) (2012), this restraining
order is granted without bond. Accordingly, the Commission need not post a bond.
IV. INSPECTION AND COPYING OF BOOKS AND RECORDS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
19. Representatives of the Commission shall be immediately allowed to inspect
the books, records, and other documents of the Defendants, Relief Defendants, and their
agents including, but not limited to, paper documents, electronically stored information
("ESI"), tape recordings, and computer discs, wherever they may be situated and whether they
are in the possession of the Defendants, Relief Defendants or others, and to copy said
documents, data and records, either on or off the premises where they may be situated.
20. Defendants and Relief Defendants shall, within 24 hours of the service of this
Order upon them, cause to be prepared and delivered to the Commission, a detailed and
complete schedule of all passwords for any encrypted ESI in the possession or control of the
Defendants and/or Relief Defendants that relate to the business practices of any Defendant
and/or Relief Defendant or the business or personal finances of any Defendant and/or Relief
Defendant. Defendants and Relief Defendants shall, within 24 hour of the service of this
Order upon them, cause to be prepared and delivered to the Commission, a detailed and
complete schedule of all desk top computers, laptop computers and/or other computers owned
and/or used by them in connection with their business. The schedules required by this section
shall include at a minimum the make, model and description of each, along with the location,
the name of the person primarily assigned to use the computer, and all passwords necessary to
access and use the software contained on the computer and/or PDA. The Commission and/or
its representative shall be authorized to make an electronic, digital or hard copy of all of the
data contained on the computer(s).
21. Within five (5) business days following the service of this Order,
Defendants and Relief Defendants shall provide the Commission immediate access to all
records of Defendants and/or Relief Defendants held by financial institutions located within
or outside the territorial United States by signing the Consent to Release of Financial Records
attached to this Order and submitting same to counsel for the Commission.
V. SERVICE OF ORDER AND ASSISTANCE OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
23. Copies of this Order may be served by any means, including facsimile
transmission, upon any financial institution or other entity or person that may have
possession, custody, or control of any documents or assets of any Defendant and/or Relief
Defendant or that may be subject to any provision of this Order.
22. Timothy J. Mulreany, JonMarc P. Buffa, Kyong J. Koh, Patricia Gomersall,
Jeremy Christianson, and representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the
United States Marshal Service are specially appointed by the Court to effect service.
23. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Marshal's Service
and other any other cooperating federal, state or local law enforcement officials, are hereby
authorized to accompany and assist the Commission's representatives outside and inside the
premises of Defendants and/or Relief Defendants, as well as to secure the premises, in the
service and execution of this Order.
24. The Commission shall promptly file proof of service with the Court once
service has been accomplished.
V. SERVICE ON THE COMMISSION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
25. The Defendants and Relief Defendants shall comply with all electronic filing
rules and requirements of the U.S. District Court of the Middle District of Alabama and shall
serve all pleadings, correspondence, notices required by this Order, and other materials on the
Commission by delivering a copy to Timothy J. Mulreany, Division of Enforcement,
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20581, by electronic filing, e-mail, personal delivery or courier service (such as Federal
Express or United Parcel Service) and not by regular mail due to potential delay resulting
from heightened security and decontamination procedures applicable to the Commission's
regular mail.
VI. FORCE AND EFFECT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
26. This Statutory Restraining Order is binding on all parties to this action, their
officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and on those persons in active concert or
participation with them who receive actual notice of this Statutory Restraining Order. This
Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for all purposes.
27. Plaintiff is directed to comply with Local Rule 4.1, and promptly effect service
of process on Defendants and Relief Defendants in accordance with Local Rule 4.1, and to
provide Defendants and Relief Defendants with all of the material required by the Local
Rules. Plaintiff is under a continuing obligation to notify and serve any papers subsequently
filed with the Court on Defendants and Relief Defendants until the preliminary injunction
hearing or until counsel for Defendants and Relief Defendants files a notice of appearance,
whichever occurs first.
28. Defendants and Relief Defendants are hereby ordered to SHOW CAUSE why
the Plaintiff's separately filed Motion for Preliminary Injunction should not be granted, and
shall file their response(s) thereto, including all counter or opposing affidavits and a
memorandum of legal authority, within ten (10) days of service.
29. The restraining order will expire 14 days from the date of this order, on
August 10, 2015.
30. A HEARING as to whether this Statutory Restraining Order should be
converted to a preliminary injunction will be held on August 10, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in
Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One
Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, before the undersigned. Counsel shall appear in
person and telephonic appearances will not be permitted.
31. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to email a copy of this Order to counsel
for the Plaintiff and confirm receipt of same.
DONE, this the 27th day of July, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
cc: Counsel of Record
*****************
>>>TNTBS's YouTube Channel<<<
RamblerNash- GURU HUNTER
- Posts : 24270
Join date : 2015-02-19
Re: CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT - DINAR, CORP., INC.
It looks like DinarCorp was selling reserves illegally. So, will anyone who has paid and received their order have to return them?
*****************
>>>TNTBS's YouTube Channel<<<
Ssmith- GURU HUNTER
- Posts : 20495
Join date : 2012-04-10
Re: CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT - DINAR, CORP., INC.
Just guessing, but most likely not ... however I suspect those who have been purchasing them and have not paid them off are most likely screwed.
*****************
Trust but Verify --- R Reagan
"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you."1 Thessalonians 5:14–18
Kevind53- Super Moderator
- Posts : 27254
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 24
Location : Umm right here!
Re: CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1: 15cv538-MHT - DINAR, CORP., INC.
it's illegal for any of those currency dealers to sell reserves. Especially since more likely they didn't have the dinar in storage to protect the reserve.
Muskie- VIP Member
- Posts : 137
Join date : 2015-06-08
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Fri May 10, 2024 5:03 pm by kenlej
» Go Russia
Sun May 05, 2024 11:37 am by kenlej
» Go Russia
Sun May 05, 2024 10:51 am by kenlej
» Textbook Tony
Mon Apr 29, 2024 4:13 pm by Mission1st
» The Rockefellers and the controllers are freaking out right about now
Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:16 am by kenlej
» Phony Tony sez: Full Steam Ahead!
Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:51 am by Mission1st
» Dave Schmidt - Zim Notes for Purchase (NOT PHYSICAL NOTES)
Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:45 am by Mission1st
» Russia aren't taking any prisoners
Fri Apr 05, 2024 6:48 pm by kenlej
» Deadly stampede could affect Iraq’s World Cup hopes 1/19/23
Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:02 am by Ditartyn
» ZIGPLACE
Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:29 am by Zig
» CBD Vape Cartridges
Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:10 pm by Arendac
» Classic Tony is back
Tue Mar 05, 2024 2:53 pm by Mission1st
» THE MUSINGS OF A MADMAN
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:40 am by Arendac
» Minister of Transport: We do not have authority over any airport in Iraq
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:40 am by Verina
» Did Okie Die?
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:34 am by Arendac
» Hello all, I’m new
Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:46 pm by Jonny_5
» The Renfrows: Prophets for Profits, Happy Anniversary!
Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:46 pm by Mission1st
» What Happens when Cancer is treated with Cannabis? VIDEO
Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:58 am by MadisonParrish
» An Awesome talk between Tucker and Russell Brand
Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:16 am by kenlej
» Trafficking in children
Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:43 pm by kenlej