Heather Update #11 8/1/17 ~Update #3~

[list=commentlist]
[*]Neil Wolfe says : Reply
July 31, 2017 at 9:17 pm
There’s a Tomcat in Tennessee that signed up for the Pacer system and pulled the arrest warrant from the fed court doc system.
Take note a DEPUTY Clerk signed the warrant- not the magistrate whose stamp appears above, not even the Clerk Of The Court but instead a DEPUTY clerk- Tomcat also points out that it looks as if the magistrate’s stamp was scored from the signature area after that magistrate decided they didn’t want their signature on this warrant.
Bobcat is looking into this further and has promised to keep me abreast of any more relevant discoveries- Bobcat believe’s that Tenn. law requires a Magistrate or Judge’s signature on an arrest warrant. I’m no legal eagle but I thought that was the case as well.
I do not know for sure that this document is authentic however Bobcat strikes me as an authentic source bringing forward what appears to be credible, authentic documents- further verification is always encouraged.
https://2img.net/h/s2.postimg.cc/lyhorbprt/Screen_Shot_2017-07-31_at_8.49.24_PM.png

• BZ ⒾAM Riger says : Reply
  July 31, 2017 at 9:25 pm
  Neil and Tomcat , great work it is now up on the post.
  
  
  
  • BZ ⒾAM Riger says : Reply
    July 31, 2017 at 9:28 pm
    look to bottom of page to see snip I posted here
    http://www.mtas.tennessee.edu/Knowledgebase.nsf/0/D44ACE66EAEABF2D85256C010044B5ED?OpenDocument
    With respect to your second question as to whether the deputy court clerk who also is employed by county sheriff’s department, there is authority to support my conclusion as we discussed this morning – that is, that such an individual can not issue warrants from the Municipal Court. First, the Bush case cited previously stresses that an individual must be “neutral and detached” in order to deliberate on a determination of probable cause. Since your deputy clerk is employed also by the sheriff’s department, which is a law enforcement entity, it would be difficult if not impossible for such an individual to remain “neutral and detached.” Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 90-07 is on point in this matter in that the Attorney General concluded that “a deputy general sessions court clerk who is also a full-time deputy sheriff, but whose sole duty as deputy sheriff involves only civil process, is not a ‘neutral or detached’ magistrate or clerk for the purpose of taking from law enforcement officers affidavits of complaint necessary for the issuance of arrest warrants or criminal summonses.” Based on the above authorities it is clear that your deputy court clerk should not issue arrest and search warrants.
    
    
    
    • Rodger says :
      July 31, 2017 at 11:37 pm
      Rule 4: Arrest Warrant or Summons on a Complaint.
      (a) Issuance of Warrant or Summons. If the affidavit of complaint and any supporting affidavits filed with it establish that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the defendant has committed it, the magistrate or clerk shall issue an arrest warrant to an officer authorized by law to execute it or shall issue a criminal summons for the appearance of the defendant. More than one warrant or criminal summons may issue on the same complaint.
      (1) Warrant. The arrest warrant shall:
      (A) be signed by the magistrate or clerk;
      (B) contain the name of the defendant or, if this name is unknown, any name or description by which the defendant can be identified with reasonable certainty;
      (C) indicate the county in which the warrant is issued;
      (D) describe the offense charged in the affidavit of complaint; and
      (E) order that the defendant be arrested and brought before the nearest appropriate magistrate in the county of arrest.
      https://www.tncourts.gov/rules/rules-criminal-procedure/4
      
    • Rodger says :
      July 31, 2017 at 11:49 pm
      Rule 4 [TN Rules of criminal procedure] was substantially derived from the corresponding federal rule and § 40-6-202 of the Law Revision Commission’s proposed code.
      Note that the rule provides specifically for the reissuance of unexecuted complaints and summonses.
      Wherever the words “magistrate” and “clerk” appear in Rule 4, they are to be understood as being qualified by the words “who is neutral and detached and who is capable of the probable cause determination required by this rule.” See Shadwick v. City of Tampa, 407 U.S. 345 (1972).
      https://www.tncourts.gov/rules/rules-criminal-procedure/4
      
    • BZ ⒾAM Riger says :
      August 1, 2017 at 12:14 am
      look to bottom of page to see snip I posted here
      http://www.mtas.tennessee.edu/Knowledgebase.nsf/0/D44ACE66EAEABF2D85256C010044B5ED?OpenDocument
      With respect to your second question as to whether the deputy court clerk who also is employed by county sheriff’s department, there is authority to support my conclusion as we discussed this morning – that is, that such an individual can not issue warrants from the Municipal Court. First, the Bush case cited previously stresses that an individual must be “neutral and detached” in order to deliberate on a determination of probable cause. Since your deputy clerk is employed also by the sheriff’s department, which is a law enforcement entity, it would be difficult if not impossible for such an individual to remain “neutral and detached.” Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 90-07 is on point in this matter in that the Attorney General concluded that “a deputy general sessions court clerk who is also a full-time deputy sheriff, but whose sole duty as deputy sheriff involves only civil process, is not a ‘neutral or detached’ magistrate or clerk for the purpose of taking from law enforcement officers affidavits of complaint necessary for the issuance of arrest warrants or criminal summonses.” Based on the above authorities it is clear that your deputy court clerk should not issue arrest and search warrants.
      
    • Rodger says :
      August 1, 2017 at 1:08 am
      Not US District Court TN Eastern District court clerk Angela Brush (A. Brush), 865-545-4234, Ext. 2226, also an employee of the sheriff’s department?
      In 2015, Angela was jury clerk: http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/docs/jury_handbook_knoxville.pdf
      Court clerks: http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/directory.php
      Knox County Sheriff’s department: http://www.knoxsheriff.org/contact/
      
    • Rodger says :
      August 1, 2017 at 10:42 am
      Angela Brush (A. Brush) is not likely to be a federal employee of the US District Court Tennessee Eastern District AND Knox County, so the the “neutral and detached” issue caused by being employed by a law enforcement entity while signing off on federal arrest warrants would not exist.
      
    
    
    
  • Neil Wolfe says : Reply
    July 31, 2017 at 9:28 pm
    Thanks!
    
  
  
  
• Rodger says : Reply
  July 31, 2017 at 11:13 pm
  https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.tned.82728.16.0.pdf
  
• Rodger says : Reply
  August 1, 2017 at 12:31 am
  http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.188252/gov.uscourts.dcd.188252.1.0.pdf
  

[*] Chad says : Reply
July 31, 2017 at 10:33 pm
Great Job Mr Wolfe
I love it. HATF Is going to have fun with this They have no jurisdiction. And they always keep their Court appointed certificate holder Present to force business upon you . I’m wishing They Grant you video recording privilages And a better parking spot on Friday ..lmao Thank you for your knowledge and your courage to report The truth.. I know your doing This for everyone and out of the kindness of your heart .
But you sir will be rewarded
My the Lord be with you Brother …

• Neil Wolfe says : Reply
  August 1, 2017 at 6:00 am
  Thanks Chad- hopefully all good people who have the welfare of others at heart will soon be rewarded with the stewardship of humanity’s wealth for the prosperity of all.
  

[*] Anastasia says : Reply
August 1, 2017 at 7:49 am
Yes Chad! I wholeheartedly concur about the no jurisdiction thing. It’s such a joke really – we are INFINITE Beings of Love, Light and all that is awesome. How can some dumb little 3D construct ever have jurisdiction over such a BEING?!
Go Heather! Break the shackles of illusion. What a beautiful week this is. The old construct finally fading away and dropping to the sidelines for the new to emerge.
[*] Oceanno says : Reply
August 1, 2017 at 10:00 am
Wow this is got to be the Best week for humanity! Heather and Randy’s name will go down as pioneers. Sending Love and Joy Heather and Randy’s Way.
[/list]


[/left]
[/center]

Invalid Arrest Warrant?

https://www.pscp.tv/TheLightReports/1YqxombEnaAGv?

Ssmith wrote:

[*]

• 
  
  • 
    
    • BZ ⒾAM Riger says :
      August 1, 2017 at 12:14 am
      look to bottom of page to see snip I posted here
      http://www.mtas.tennessee.edu/Knowledgebase.nsf/0/D44ACE66EAEABF2D85256C010044B5ED?OpenDocument
      With respect to your second question as to whether the deputy court clerk who also is employed by county sheriff’s department, there is authority to support my conclusion as we discussed this morning – that is, that such an individual can not issue warrants from the Municipal Court. First, the Bush case cited previously stresses that an individual must be “neutral and detached” in order to deliberate on a determination of probable cause. Since your deputy clerk is employed also by the sheriff’s department, which is a law enforcement entity, it would be difficult if not impossible for such an individual to remain “neutral and detached.” Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. No. 90-07 is on point in this matter in that the Attorney General concluded that “a deputy general sessions court clerk who is also a full-time deputy sheriff, but whose sole duty as deputy sheriff involves only civil process, is not a ‘neutral or detached’ magistrate or clerk for the purpose of taking from law enforcement officers affidavits of complaint necessary for the issuance of arrest warrants or criminal summonses.” Based on the above authorities it is clear that your deputy court clerk should not issue arrest and search warrants.
      
    • Rodger says :
      August 1, 2017 at 1:08 am
      Not US District Court TN Eastern District court clerk Angela Brush (A. Brush), 865-545-4234, Ext. 2226, also an employee of the sheriff’s department?
      In 2015, Angela was jury clerk: http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/docs/jury_handbook_knoxville.pdf
      Court clerks: http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/directory.php
      Knox County Sheriff’s department: http://www.knoxsheriff.org/contact/
      
    • Rodger says :
      August 1, 2017 at 10:42 am
      Angela Brush (A. Brush) is not likely to be a federal employee of the US District Court Tennessee Eastern District AND Knox County, so the the “neutral and detached” issue caused by being employed by a law enforcement entity while signing off on federal arrest warrants would not exist.
      
    
    
    
  
  
  

[*]

I don't know why these folks think it was signed by Deputy Clerk. LOL

It was signed by the courtroom deputy clerk, Angela Brush.


[*]

Courtroom Deputy Clerk

This person makes sure everything in the courtroom is in place and that the trial flows smoothly and according to plan.  The clerk swears in anyone who must be placed under oath before testifying.  The clerk also takes care of the members of the jury, ensuring they can move from place to place within the courthouse, and acting as a courier if the jury has questions to ask the judge during deliberation.  The clerk is in charge of all forms, documents, and evidence that might be needed during the course of a hearing or trial.  Each district has one supervisory Clerk of Court, who then has one or more deputy clerks who assist with case management and courtroom duties.  The clerk works for the judicial branch of government.


http://judiciallearningcenter.org/the-players-in-the-courtroom/