Steffen Rowe/Tank -Re: "We're Being Used" 2/25/19

by **Ssmith** Tue Feb 26, 2019 10:53 am

https://www.dinardaily.net/t82355-we-re-being-used-message-for-tank-by-anonymous-2-24-19

Wells Fargo is already operating with 200% negative liquidity. We don’t have a primary name to use because the controlling parties of the bank don’t actually use their names. They go by the “Chinese Elders”. Furthermore, the exchange is designed to destroy the world’s economy. The alleged Military that have exchanged are not willing to come forward for fear of losing the SKRs they still can’t access.

Although I appreciate your desire to take action, filing a lawsuit at this time would only prove to be a waste of time as the Legal authority over these matters has demonstrated that they do not work for the people, but for the parties we would be suing.

The current plan of action requires the people to put aside their differences and stand together. If we do not form a collective voice then we will change nothing. All of our power is in our awareness of our power.

Food
Water
Air
Each other.

These are the core issues we can stand together on. Regardless of race, sex, nationality, cast, color, sexual orientation, or political party we can all find enough evidence to prove these things are being poisoned to hurt humanity. In like manner, we can agree that we don’t want that. Simple.

Forming a unified voice about issues that matter is the only way we’ll be heard. Meanwhile, the Trustee has already taken down the Federal Reserve and made plans to support the liberation of humanity in other ways.

It’s impossible to use the law to assist us if the parties we are using the law against, don’t respect or adhere to the laws.

-TANK
GoCamelot.com
Kre8change.today
SPEAKPROJECT.net

by **Ssmith** Tue Feb 26, 2019 10:53 am

"In Response to TANK" by R

Your response to the effort to not revive a class action against the Banks is understood. I agree that Wells Fargo's use of the name "Chinese Elders" does evade specific individuals to hold accountable for the unfair early exchanges.

Al Hodges faced a similar problem when the feckless Sec hid behind a rule, where individuals at the Sec could not be singled out (Christopher C-- for example). Hodges went ahead with a lower court case anyway, a case in which he knew the courts would refuse his evidence . This was simply to create the beginnings of a live paper trail of coercion from government financial figures which
was recorded until this day. To keep this a short message, you still should consider beginning a class action in a lower court, in any way possible.

R

by **Kevind53** Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:39 am

Steffen Rowe/Tank -Re: "We're Being Used" 2/25/19

Steffen Rowe/Tank -Re: "We're Being Used" 2/25/19

Re: Steffen Rowe/Tank -Re: "We're Being Used" 2/25/19

Re: Steffen Rowe/Tank -Re: "We're Being Used" 2/25/19