Latest topics
Moody's affirms Iraq's Caa1 ratings, maintains stable outlook
2 posters
Dinar Daily :: DINAR/IRAQ -- NEWS -- GURUS and DISCUSSIONS :: IRAQ and DINAR -- ARTICLE BASED INFORMATION and DISCUSSIONS
Page 1 of 1
Moody's affirms Iraq's Caa1 ratings, maintains stable outlook
Moody's affirms Iraq's Caa1 ratings, maintains stable outlook
30 Jul 2019
New York, July 30, 2019 -- Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has today affirmed the Government of Iraq's long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings at Caa1 and maintained the stable outlook.
The decision to affirm Iraq's Caa1 ratings reflects credit challenges posed by very weak institutions and governance that in Moody's view, will continue to limit policy effectiveness, constrain the government's capacity to respond to external and domestic shocks and weigh on the -- currently very weak - competitiveness of Iraq's economy. The Caa1 rating level also captures Iraq's inherently very high level of political risk, in part related to political strife which will slow reform progress, hamper a strengthening of institutions and contribute to maintaining very high fiscal, external and economic vulnerability to potential declines in oil prices.
The stable outlook balances a number of potential positive and negative drivers. Recent improvements in security are set against the country's overall fragility given its deep political, ethnic and sectarian fragmentation and rising social pressures. Similarly, recent pledges of reconstruction assistance from the international community could have significant credit positive effects; but the formidable size of the task, which is exacerbated by very weak institutions and the absence of a coherent medium-term reform agenda, materially reduces the likely credit impact. And while the stable outlook reflects potential economic and fiscal upside from the government's plans to increase oil production in the medium term, it also takes into account the near-term constraints from Iraq's commitment to comply with the oil output cuts agreed by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and generally weak investment absorption capacity.
Iraq's country ceilings remain unchanged. The foreign currency bond ceiling is at B3, the foreign currency deposit ceiling at Caa2, and the long-term local currency bond and deposit ceilings at B3.
RATINGS RATIONALE
RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMING THE Caa1 RATINGS
WEAK INSTITUTIONS AND GOVERNANCE ARE THE KEY CREDIT CONSTRAINT
In Moody's view, Iraq's rating will remain constrained by weak institutions and governance that will limit the government's capacity to implement reforms and respond effectively to external and domestic shocks. This constraint has not been alleviated materially over the past two years.
Iraq has made little progress on structural and legislative reforms that would meaningfully strengthen its institutional framework, improve policy effectiveness and enhance the government's policy implementation capacity, all of which remain hampered by governance challenges and pervasive corruption.
In particular, although Iraq has developed an anti-corruption and anti-money laundering framework, and earlier this year established a new High Council for Combatting Corruption, coordination between the relevant government agencies and institutions remains weak, which impedes effective implementation, supervision, and enforcement. According to the most recent Worldwide Governance Indicators, Iraq continues to rank among the weakest 10% of sovereigns rated by Moody's with regards to rule of law, control of corruption, and government effectiveness.
Moreover, most structural and fiscal reform measures committed under the three-year IMF program, which expired in July 2019, were either not enacted or reversed during the past two years. This includes a reversal of spending cuts implemented in 2016-17, no significant new non-oil revenue streams being introduced, and no significant progress towards a stronger supervision and a comprehensive restructuring of the banking system. Reforms of the public financial management framework remain in initial stages.
Moody's believes that Iraq's banking system, dominated by very weak state-owned banks, poses risks to Iraq's financial stability and financial intermediation, and is a source of government liquidity risks, given the sovereign's reliance on the domestic banks for the rollover of its domestic debt, which stood at 18% of GDP in 2018, nearly all of which is short term. Impending recapitalization of state-owned banks also presents a significant contingent liability risk for the sovereign.
In Moody's view, a new general financial management law, which was approved in May this year, offers a prospect for more effective fiscal policy. The new legislation mandates greater fiscal transparency, constrains parliament's capacity to amend the budget and limits scope for extrabudgetary spending. However, in the absence of additional measures, including a comprehensive overhaul of the public sector wage bill, current spending -- which is expected to rise around 20% in 2019 and accounts for nearly half of total government spending -- will remain the key source of fiscal pressure, especially if oil prices decline.
Weak institutions and implementation capacity challenges have delayed post-war reconstruction efforts and slowed the execution of critical public investment projects, including in the electricity sector. This has contributed to sluggish non-oil growth, which was only 0.8% in 2018, after a 0.6% contraction in 2017. Furthermore, lack of new public investment in power generation and poor maintenance of the electricity transmission grid has led to frequent and lengthy power cuts which, along with rising popular discontent with endemic corruption, poor delivery of public services and insufficient job creation, triggered wide-spread violent protests in the southern, oil-producing region of Basrah during last summer. Such protests are likely to reoccur until the deep issues of inadequate physical and social infrastructure and rife corruption are addressed.
INHERENTLY VERY HIGH LEVEL OF POLITICAL RISK
In Moody's assessment, inherently high level of political risk constitutes another formidable constraint on Iraq's rating, which, in turn, impedes the strengthening of the country's institutions.
Although the security situation in Iraq has improved appreciably since the defeat of ISIS in 2017, as the government regained territorial control over areas previously captured by the self-proclaimed jihadist state, Iraq's domestic political and security risks remain substantial. ISIS continues to operate in the rural areas of central and northwestern Iraq, continues to stage small-scale terrorist attacks across the country, and could re-emerge especially if the government fails to improve the delivery of basic public services, in particular in the Sunni-majority areas. Furthermore, other militias periodically attack US and other foreign targets in Iraq, raising risks for foreign investors, including international oil companies.
Domestic political stability risks have been highlighted by the extended stalemate following the May 2018 elections; it took more than one year to appoint all the members of the cabinet due to deep fragmentation of the political landscape along ethnic and sectarian lines and the rise in prominence of populist political movements in parliament. Delays in government formation have prevented the completion of IMF program reviews since August 2017, while rising pressures to increase social spending have translated in a significantly expansionary budget for 2019, reversing the previous year's fiscal consolidation.
Iraq is also significantly exposed to multiple geopolitical risks. Rising geopolitical tensions in the Gulf threaten disruptions to the maritime transport routes through the Strait of Hormuz, on which Iraq depends for most of its oil exports. The rising tensions could also complicate progress on urgent energy reforms, which require participation of foreign companies, as well as post-war rebuilding efforts. Furthermore, the US (Aaa stable) sanctions on Iran present a direct challenge given Iraq's significant reliance on Iranian imports, including electricity and natural gas for power generation. Finally, the risk of spillovers from the continuing instability in Syria remains.
HIGH VULNERABLITY TO POTENTIAL DECLINES IN OIL PRICES
Moody's expects that Iraq's fiscal and external position will remain highly vulnerable to potential oil price declines.
Although Iraq's fiscal and external balances improved significantly in 2018, this was almost entirely due to higher oil prices without any structural improvement that would reduce the impact of future possible falls in oil prices. Moody's estimates that a $10/barrel decline in oil prices would lead to a 4-5% of GDP deterioration in Iraq's fiscal and external positions. A persistent fall of the same magnitude would increase Iraq's government debt by close to 30% of GDP over five years above Moody's current expectations that assume that oil prices will fluctuate between $50-70/barrel in the medium term. Similarly, such an oil price decline would also erode Iraq's foreign currency reserves and significantly increase government liquidity pressures, given the sovereign's lack of established international capital market access and the absence of meaningful fiscal buffers accumulated during the periods of higher oil prices.
In the absence of new measures, Moody's expects that Iraq's vulnerability to oil price fluctuation will increase in the next several years. This is primarily due to the reversals of the fiscal consolidation efforts during 2018-19 that, according to the IMF, will increase Iraq's fiscal and external breakeven oil prices (the prices that balance the government's budget and current account) above $60/barrel for Brent during 2019-2020.
Iraq's breakevens could decline if the government's plans to increase crude oil production capacity by around 2 million barrels per day (mbpd) to 6.5 mbpd by 2028 translate into higher actual production levels. However, Moody's expects that Iraq's compliance with OPEC production restraint and, over the more medium term, investment implementation delays will reduce the government's ability to make significant progress towards its ambitious production targets.
RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK
The stable outlook balances a number of potential positive and negative drivers.
The stable outlook reflects a balance between the recent improvement in the security situation and the fragility of the country's overall political, economic, and fiscal position.
Financial pledges from the international community to support Iraq's immediate reconstruction needs are balanced against the formidable size of the task at hand and other long-standing socio-economic challenges, exacerbated by very weak institutions and the absence of a coherent medium-term reform agenda.
Potential fiscal and economic upside from the planned increases in oil production capacity will be constrained by the limited scope to actually increase production in an environment of moderate oil prices given Iraq's membership of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its obligation to adhere to OPEC production restraint agreements, the latest of which was extended until March 2020.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP
Over the medium term, signs that Iraq's institutions are strengthening, with material improvement in governance, control of corruption and management of public finances would likely lead to an upgrade.
Such improvements would likely point to strengthening the sovereign's fiscal metrics, independent of fluctuations in oil prices, reflecting the implementation of structural measures that reduce and enhance the effectiveness of spending.
An improvement in Iraq's institutions would likely happen in the context of easing political and geopolitical tensions that Moody's expect to last.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN
Given the already low rating, a downgrade would likely reflect Moody's view that default risks and the related losses for investors were rising.
This would be most likely to arise in the case of a worsening in the government's fiscal position significantly beyond Moody's current expectations, potentially due to rising social and reconstruction spending pressures. A material increase in domestic political tensions and/or violence that would threaten to disrupt oil production and interfere with the government's ability to collect revenue and service its debt would also increase the likelihood of a downgrade.
GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 17,659 (2018 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)
Real GDP growth (% change): 0.6% (2018 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)
Inflation Rate (CPI,% change Dec / Dec): -0.1% (2018 Actual)
Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: 6.2% (2018 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)
Current Account Balance/GDP: 5.7% (2018 Actual) (also known as External Balance)
External debt/GDP: 30.5% (2018 Actual)
Level of economic development: Very Low level of economic resilience
Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983.
On 25 July 2019, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Iraq, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer's institutional strength/ framework, have not materially changed. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially decreased. The issuer's susceptibility to event risks has not materially changed.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in November 2018. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.
The local market analyst for this rating is Alexander Perjessy , +971 (423) 795-48.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
David Rogovic
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Marie Diron
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 852 3551 3077
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
:copyright: 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-affirms-Iraqs-Caa1-ratings-maintains-stable-outlook--PR_402741?WT.mc_id=AM%7ERmluYW56ZW4ubmV0X1JTQl9SYXRpbmdzX05ld3NfTm9fVHJhbnNsYXRpb25z%7E20190730_PR_402741
30 Jul 2019
New York, July 30, 2019 -- Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has today affirmed the Government of Iraq's long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings at Caa1 and maintained the stable outlook.
The decision to affirm Iraq's Caa1 ratings reflects credit challenges posed by very weak institutions and governance that in Moody's view, will continue to limit policy effectiveness, constrain the government's capacity to respond to external and domestic shocks and weigh on the -- currently very weak - competitiveness of Iraq's economy. The Caa1 rating level also captures Iraq's inherently very high level of political risk, in part related to political strife which will slow reform progress, hamper a strengthening of institutions and contribute to maintaining very high fiscal, external and economic vulnerability to potential declines in oil prices.
The stable outlook balances a number of potential positive and negative drivers. Recent improvements in security are set against the country's overall fragility given its deep political, ethnic and sectarian fragmentation and rising social pressures. Similarly, recent pledges of reconstruction assistance from the international community could have significant credit positive effects; but the formidable size of the task, which is exacerbated by very weak institutions and the absence of a coherent medium-term reform agenda, materially reduces the likely credit impact. And while the stable outlook reflects potential economic and fiscal upside from the government's plans to increase oil production in the medium term, it also takes into account the near-term constraints from Iraq's commitment to comply with the oil output cuts agreed by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and generally weak investment absorption capacity.
Iraq's country ceilings remain unchanged. The foreign currency bond ceiling is at B3, the foreign currency deposit ceiling at Caa2, and the long-term local currency bond and deposit ceilings at B3.
RATINGS RATIONALE
RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMING THE Caa1 RATINGS
WEAK INSTITUTIONS AND GOVERNANCE ARE THE KEY CREDIT CONSTRAINT
In Moody's view, Iraq's rating will remain constrained by weak institutions and governance that will limit the government's capacity to implement reforms and respond effectively to external and domestic shocks. This constraint has not been alleviated materially over the past two years.
Iraq has made little progress on structural and legislative reforms that would meaningfully strengthen its institutional framework, improve policy effectiveness and enhance the government's policy implementation capacity, all of which remain hampered by governance challenges and pervasive corruption.
In particular, although Iraq has developed an anti-corruption and anti-money laundering framework, and earlier this year established a new High Council for Combatting Corruption, coordination between the relevant government agencies and institutions remains weak, which impedes effective implementation, supervision, and enforcement. According to the most recent Worldwide Governance Indicators, Iraq continues to rank among the weakest 10% of sovereigns rated by Moody's with regards to rule of law, control of corruption, and government effectiveness.
Moreover, most structural and fiscal reform measures committed under the three-year IMF program, which expired in July 2019, were either not enacted or reversed during the past two years. This includes a reversal of spending cuts implemented in 2016-17, no significant new non-oil revenue streams being introduced, and no significant progress towards a stronger supervision and a comprehensive restructuring of the banking system. Reforms of the public financial management framework remain in initial stages.
Moody's believes that Iraq's banking system, dominated by very weak state-owned banks, poses risks to Iraq's financial stability and financial intermediation, and is a source of government liquidity risks, given the sovereign's reliance on the domestic banks for the rollover of its domestic debt, which stood at 18% of GDP in 2018, nearly all of which is short term. Impending recapitalization of state-owned banks also presents a significant contingent liability risk for the sovereign.
In Moody's view, a new general financial management law, which was approved in May this year, offers a prospect for more effective fiscal policy. The new legislation mandates greater fiscal transparency, constrains parliament's capacity to amend the budget and limits scope for extrabudgetary spending. However, in the absence of additional measures, including a comprehensive overhaul of the public sector wage bill, current spending -- which is expected to rise around 20% in 2019 and accounts for nearly half of total government spending -- will remain the key source of fiscal pressure, especially if oil prices decline.
Weak institutions and implementation capacity challenges have delayed post-war reconstruction efforts and slowed the execution of critical public investment projects, including in the electricity sector. This has contributed to sluggish non-oil growth, which was only 0.8% in 2018, after a 0.6% contraction in 2017. Furthermore, lack of new public investment in power generation and poor maintenance of the electricity transmission grid has led to frequent and lengthy power cuts which, along with rising popular discontent with endemic corruption, poor delivery of public services and insufficient job creation, triggered wide-spread violent protests in the southern, oil-producing region of Basrah during last summer. Such protests are likely to reoccur until the deep issues of inadequate physical and social infrastructure and rife corruption are addressed.
INHERENTLY VERY HIGH LEVEL OF POLITICAL RISK
In Moody's assessment, inherently high level of political risk constitutes another formidable constraint on Iraq's rating, which, in turn, impedes the strengthening of the country's institutions.
Although the security situation in Iraq has improved appreciably since the defeat of ISIS in 2017, as the government regained territorial control over areas previously captured by the self-proclaimed jihadist state, Iraq's domestic political and security risks remain substantial. ISIS continues to operate in the rural areas of central and northwestern Iraq, continues to stage small-scale terrorist attacks across the country, and could re-emerge especially if the government fails to improve the delivery of basic public services, in particular in the Sunni-majority areas. Furthermore, other militias periodically attack US and other foreign targets in Iraq, raising risks for foreign investors, including international oil companies.
Domestic political stability risks have been highlighted by the extended stalemate following the May 2018 elections; it took more than one year to appoint all the members of the cabinet due to deep fragmentation of the political landscape along ethnic and sectarian lines and the rise in prominence of populist political movements in parliament. Delays in government formation have prevented the completion of IMF program reviews since August 2017, while rising pressures to increase social spending have translated in a significantly expansionary budget for 2019, reversing the previous year's fiscal consolidation.
Iraq is also significantly exposed to multiple geopolitical risks. Rising geopolitical tensions in the Gulf threaten disruptions to the maritime transport routes through the Strait of Hormuz, on which Iraq depends for most of its oil exports. The rising tensions could also complicate progress on urgent energy reforms, which require participation of foreign companies, as well as post-war rebuilding efforts. Furthermore, the US (Aaa stable) sanctions on Iran present a direct challenge given Iraq's significant reliance on Iranian imports, including electricity and natural gas for power generation. Finally, the risk of spillovers from the continuing instability in Syria remains.
HIGH VULNERABLITY TO POTENTIAL DECLINES IN OIL PRICES
Moody's expects that Iraq's fiscal and external position will remain highly vulnerable to potential oil price declines.
Although Iraq's fiscal and external balances improved significantly in 2018, this was almost entirely due to higher oil prices without any structural improvement that would reduce the impact of future possible falls in oil prices. Moody's estimates that a $10/barrel decline in oil prices would lead to a 4-5% of GDP deterioration in Iraq's fiscal and external positions. A persistent fall of the same magnitude would increase Iraq's government debt by close to 30% of GDP over five years above Moody's current expectations that assume that oil prices will fluctuate between $50-70/barrel in the medium term. Similarly, such an oil price decline would also erode Iraq's foreign currency reserves and significantly increase government liquidity pressures, given the sovereign's lack of established international capital market access and the absence of meaningful fiscal buffers accumulated during the periods of higher oil prices.
In the absence of new measures, Moody's expects that Iraq's vulnerability to oil price fluctuation will increase in the next several years. This is primarily due to the reversals of the fiscal consolidation efforts during 2018-19 that, according to the IMF, will increase Iraq's fiscal and external breakeven oil prices (the prices that balance the government's budget and current account) above $60/barrel for Brent during 2019-2020.
Iraq's breakevens could decline if the government's plans to increase crude oil production capacity by around 2 million barrels per day (mbpd) to 6.5 mbpd by 2028 translate into higher actual production levels. However, Moody's expects that Iraq's compliance with OPEC production restraint and, over the more medium term, investment implementation delays will reduce the government's ability to make significant progress towards its ambitious production targets.
RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK
The stable outlook balances a number of potential positive and negative drivers.
The stable outlook reflects a balance between the recent improvement in the security situation and the fragility of the country's overall political, economic, and fiscal position.
Financial pledges from the international community to support Iraq's immediate reconstruction needs are balanced against the formidable size of the task at hand and other long-standing socio-economic challenges, exacerbated by very weak institutions and the absence of a coherent medium-term reform agenda.
Potential fiscal and economic upside from the planned increases in oil production capacity will be constrained by the limited scope to actually increase production in an environment of moderate oil prices given Iraq's membership of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its obligation to adhere to OPEC production restraint agreements, the latest of which was extended until March 2020.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP
Over the medium term, signs that Iraq's institutions are strengthening, with material improvement in governance, control of corruption and management of public finances would likely lead to an upgrade.
Such improvements would likely point to strengthening the sovereign's fiscal metrics, independent of fluctuations in oil prices, reflecting the implementation of structural measures that reduce and enhance the effectiveness of spending.
An improvement in Iraq's institutions would likely happen in the context of easing political and geopolitical tensions that Moody's expect to last.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN
Given the already low rating, a downgrade would likely reflect Moody's view that default risks and the related losses for investors were rising.
This would be most likely to arise in the case of a worsening in the government's fiscal position significantly beyond Moody's current expectations, potentially due to rising social and reconstruction spending pressures. A material increase in domestic political tensions and/or violence that would threaten to disrupt oil production and interfere with the government's ability to collect revenue and service its debt would also increase the likelihood of a downgrade.
GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 17,659 (2018 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)
Real GDP growth (% change): 0.6% (2018 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)
Inflation Rate (CPI,% change Dec / Dec): -0.1% (2018 Actual)
Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: 6.2% (2018 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)
Current Account Balance/GDP: 5.7% (2018 Actual) (also known as External Balance)
External debt/GDP: 30.5% (2018 Actual)
Level of economic development: Very Low level of economic resilience
Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983.
On 25 July 2019, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Iraq, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer's institutional strength/ framework, have not materially changed. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially decreased. The issuer's susceptibility to event risks has not materially changed.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in November 2018. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.
The local market analyst for this rating is Alexander Perjessy , +971 (423) 795-48.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
David Rogovic
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Marie Diron
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 852 3551 3077
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
:copyright: 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-affirms-Iraqs-Caa1-ratings-maintains-stable-outlook--PR_402741?WT.mc_id=AM%7ERmluYW56ZW4ubmV0X1JTQl9SYXRpbmdzX05ld3NfTm9fVHJhbnNsYXRpb25z%7E20190730_PR_402741
claud39- Elite Member
- Posts : 18423
Join date : 2018-11-04
Moody’s affirms Iraq’s Caa1 ratings
Moody’s affirms Iraq’s Caa1 ratings
3rd August 2019
3rd August 2019 in Investment, Iraq Banking & Finance News, Politics
3rd August 2019
3rd August 2019 in Investment, Iraq Banking & Finance News, Politics
By John Lee.
Moody’s Investors Service has affirmed the Government of Iraq’s long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings at Caa1 and maintained the stable outlook.
The decision to affirm Iraq’s Caa1 ratings reflects credit challenges posed by very weak institutions and governance that in Moody’s view, will continue to limit policy effectiveness, constrain the government’s capacity to respond to external and domestic shocks and weigh on the — currently very weak – competitiveness of Iraq’s economy.
The Caa1 rating level also captures Iraq’s inherently very high level of political risk, in part related to political strife which will slow reform progress, hamper a strengthening of institutions and contribute to maintaining very high fiscal, external and economic vulnerability to potential declines in oil prices.
More here.
(Source: Moody’s Investors Service)
(Picture: Bonds, from Alexskopje/Shutterstock)
http://www.iraq-businessnews.com/2019/08/03/moodys-affirms-iraqs-caa1-ratings/
claud39- Elite Member
- Posts : 18423
Join date : 2018-11-04
Market appetite for Iraqi risk improves significantly
#IRAQ|28 JULY, 2019
[size=34]Market appetite for Iraqi risk improves significantly[/size]
Hussain joined Deutsche Bank in 2014 and has around 18 years of corporate finance, structured solutions, and debt capital markets experience.
He was previously with Merrill Lynch in New York, and Citigroup in London. Hussain serves on the Board of Directors of the Rand Corporation’s Center for Middle East Public Policy; is a member of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation’s Iraq Policy Group; and member of the Atlantic Council’s Task Force on the Future of Iraq.
Hussain has been featured in the Financial Times, Time Magazine, The Banker, FDI Magazine, Platts Energy Week, and the internationally broadcast CNBC Capital Connection. Hussain is recipient of the International Financing Review Global and EMEA Restructuring Deal of the Year award. Hussain holds a Bachelors of Arts with Honors from The College of William and Mary, and Master’s Degree from the School of Foreign Service and an MBA from Georgetown University.
Website: https://www.db.com/company/index.htm
Hussain Qaragholi, Head of Corporate Banking Coverage for the Northern Gulf & Levant, ME Sovereign Wealth Funds at Deutsche Bank AG
[size=16]1) Moody’s rates Iraq at Caa1. What type of reforms can the government implement to put decades of turmoil behind it?[/size]
[size=16]Moody’s unsolicited rating of the Republic of Iraq doesn’t benefit from full access and data from the government. Both Standard & Poor’s and Fitch provide solicited ratings, and have a B-/B- Stable Outlook sovereign credit rating for the Republic. Iraq ranks higher in virtually every credit metric relative to the median of its B-rated sovereign peers, including in FX reserves of $62 billion; nominal GDP and GDP per capita of $230 billion and $5,800 respectively and relatively low debt to GDP of 52%. On stand-alone economic terms, Iraq punches well above its current credit rating.
Where Iraq’s rating gets dragged down, according to the rating agencies, is mainly due to its over-dependence on commodity prices, geopolitics and lack of internal cohesiveness among other reasons. While the Government of Iraq successfully implemented some reforms agreed under the IMF’s 3-year stand-by arrangement (SBA), there are a number of reforms that are still in draft legislation awaiting a vote by Iraq’s parliament. These reforms range from diversifying the sources of government revenue (e.g. improved electricity tariff and customs collection) to fiscal consolidation.[/size]
[size=16]It should be noted that since 2003, Iraq’s nascent parliamentary democracy has had 5 successful elections and peaceful transfers of power, and since 2015, Iraq’s armed forces successfully defended its territory by defeating both the challenge from ISIS as well as containing an independence bid from the Kurdistan Regional Government. While facing these challenges, Iraq continued to increase oil production reaching an all-time record of 5 million barrels per day and becoming the 2[size=12]nd largest producer in OPEC after Saudi Arabia.
2) Iraq issued its first independent bond back in 2017 at attractive yields. Do you expect other issuances in the recent future? Will yields be as attractive?[/size][/size]
[size=16][size=16]Deutsche Bank lead-managed both of Iraq’s debut sovereign bonds in 2017, the $1 billion Iraq 2.149% coupon 2022 USAID bond, and the $1 billion Iraq 6.75% coupon 2023 bond. The current 2019 budget law doesn’t include appropriations for a bond issuance, however there are a number of approved borrowings for infrastructure financing – mainly in the form of export credit agency (ECA) and development finance institutions (DFI) covered loans.[/size][/size]
[size=16]In the loan markets, we are seeing the entry of additional international financial institutions and a significant tightening of spreads for Iraq risk. On a recent trade, we saw Iraq credit spreads approach that of its single A-rated neighbors in the Arabian Gulf.
3) What are Iraq’s infrastructure needs following the long war? What is the cost to rebuild?
Iraq’s infrastructure is dilapidated due to the decades of wars and sanctions under the Saddam Hussein era. The change of regime and the lifting of sanctions in 2003 opened Iraq to the global markets and caused a significant increase in the imports of white goods by Iraq’s 40 million population and its burgeoning middle class, leading to a material increase in energy consumption that continues to require large investments.[/size]
[size=16]The Iraq-led and internationally-supported campaign against ISIS left large swaths of Iraqi territory in ruin, including its second largest city of Mosul with a population of nearly 2 million. Investments are required in other sectors including in water, transportation, education, health and housing. The snap back of sanctions on Iran, is both a forcing mechanism and an opportunity for the Government of Iraq to increase investments in domestic gas production and the capturing of gas-flaring for power generation.[/size]
[size=16]The World Bank and Government of Iraq estimate the initial cost of reconstruction for Iraq to be approximately $88 billion. Of this amount around $77 billion was to be financed by the Government of Iraq; with $50 billion coming from oil and other revenues, and $27 billion through ECA/DFI loans and capital markets issuances. [/size]
[size=16]However, the cost to rebuild is likely to be higher if one were to include the approximately $160 billion in investments that Iraq had appropriated in its annual investment budgets from 2015 to 2019 but had not spent.[/size]
[size=16]And, if one were to add the costs of reconstructing the damage caused by ISIS, this figure would be substantially higher.[/size]
[size=16]4) What is the best way to finance these needs in your opinion?[/size]
[size=16]Iraq has a number of financing tools available at its disposal, ranging from traditional short term trade finance to bank loans and capital markets as well as donor grants and soft loans via bilateral and multilateral agencies. [/size]
[size=16]Given the gargantuan infrastructure financing requirements, I believe the Government of Iraq would be well advised to tap all of the pockets of liquidity and financing tools available to it. Additionally, Iraq’s stakeholders pledged approximately $30 billion during the Iraq investment and reconstruction conference that was held in Kuwait in February 2018. [/size]
[size=16]Of this amount, approximately $23 billion are pledged in the form of ECA and DFI-covered loans. I believe the Government of Iraq would be prudent to take the necessary steps to convert these pledges into investments in its infrastructure. [/size]
[size=16]5) How interested are emerging markets and global markets investors in the Iraqi market?
The market appetite for Iraqi risk has improved significantly in the past couple of years. The Iraq 2023 bond that [size=16]Deutsche Bank lead-managed and which was 7-times oversubscribed at the time of issuance, is currently trading above par at $104 cash price, and 5.6% yield. [/size][/size]
[size=16]These are relatively tight spreads when compared to the 5-year bond yields of its oil-producing single B name peers—e.g. Angola at 5.80%; Gabon at 6.70% and Ecuador at 6.80% -- as well as the bond yields of non-oil single B economies of Jordan and Lebanon at 5.00% and 11.65% respectively. [/size]
[size=16]6) Iraq’s fiscal deficits are expected to rise over the medium term according to the IMF. What could be the best fiscal policy for Iraq in your opinion?[/size]
[size=16]Fiscal consolidation and the shrinking of the massive federal government’s balance sheet is probably the best fiscal policy.[/size]
[size=16]In reality, the trend has been going in the opposite direction, with the previous and the current Iraqi governments having succumbed to fiscal expansionary pressures during periods of robust oil prices. [/size]
[size=16]I believe that supporting private sector participation in the economy would bring efficiencies as well as shrink the government’s balance sheet. [/size]
[size=16]As an example, inviting private sector investors to the independent power producer (IPP) program has been successful in materially increasing by over 7-8 megawatts Iraq’s power generation capacity. [/size]
[size=16]In the end, I believe that in order for Iraq to move away from reliance on the ebb and flow of oil, it would benefit from the establishment of sovereign wealth funds focused on infrastructure and impact investments, as well as saving and growing some of its oil revenue proceeds for the benefit of future generations of Iraqis.[/size]
[size=16](Editing by Gerard Aoun)[/size]
[size=16][size=16]( gerard.aoun@refinitiv.com )[/size][/size]
[size=16]Any opinions expressed here are the author’s own.[/size]
[size=16]Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. [size=16]Read our full disclaimer policy here.[/size][/size]
[size=16][size=16] Opinion 2019
https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/markets/story/Market_appetite_for_Iraqi_risk_improves_significantly-ZAWYA20190728082433/
[/size]
[/size]
[size=34]Market appetite for Iraqi risk improves significantly[/size]
[url=https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/the-vault/opinions/A135709/Hussain Qaragholi/]Hussain Qaragholi[/url]
Hussain joined Deutsche Bank in 2014 and has around 18 years of corporate finance, structured solutions, and debt capital markets experience.
He was previously with Merrill Lynch in New York, and Citigroup in London. Hussain serves on the Board of Directors of the Rand Corporation’s Center for Middle East Public Policy; is a member of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation’s Iraq Policy Group; and member of the Atlantic Council’s Task Force on the Future of Iraq.
Hussain has been featured in the Financial Times, Time Magazine, The Banker, FDI Magazine, Platts Energy Week, and the internationally broadcast CNBC Capital Connection. Hussain is recipient of the International Financing Review Global and EMEA Restructuring Deal of the Year award. Hussain holds a Bachelors of Arts with Honors from The College of William and Mary, and Master’s Degree from the School of Foreign Service and an MBA from Georgetown University.
Website: https://www.db.com/company/index.htm
Hussain Qaragholi, Head of Corporate Banking Coverage for the Northern Gulf & Levant, ME Sovereign Wealth Funds at Deutsche Bank AG
[size=16]1) Moody’s rates Iraq at Caa1. What type of reforms can the government implement to put decades of turmoil behind it?[/size]
[size=16]Moody’s unsolicited rating of the Republic of Iraq doesn’t benefit from full access and data from the government. Both Standard & Poor’s and Fitch provide solicited ratings, and have a B-/B- Stable Outlook sovereign credit rating for the Republic. Iraq ranks higher in virtually every credit metric relative to the median of its B-rated sovereign peers, including in FX reserves of $62 billion; nominal GDP and GDP per capita of $230 billion and $5,800 respectively and relatively low debt to GDP of 52%. On stand-alone economic terms, Iraq punches well above its current credit rating.
Where Iraq’s rating gets dragged down, according to the rating agencies, is mainly due to its over-dependence on commodity prices, geopolitics and lack of internal cohesiveness among other reasons. While the Government of Iraq successfully implemented some reforms agreed under the IMF’s 3-year stand-by arrangement (SBA), there are a number of reforms that are still in draft legislation awaiting a vote by Iraq’s parliament. These reforms range from diversifying the sources of government revenue (e.g. improved electricity tariff and customs collection) to fiscal consolidation.[/size]
[size=16]It should be noted that since 2003, Iraq’s nascent parliamentary democracy has had 5 successful elections and peaceful transfers of power, and since 2015, Iraq’s armed forces successfully defended its territory by defeating both the challenge from ISIS as well as containing an independence bid from the Kurdistan Regional Government. While facing these challenges, Iraq continued to increase oil production reaching an all-time record of 5 million barrels per day and becoming the 2[size=12]nd largest producer in OPEC after Saudi Arabia.
2) Iraq issued its first independent bond back in 2017 at attractive yields. Do you expect other issuances in the recent future? Will yields be as attractive?[/size][/size]
[size=16][size=16]Deutsche Bank lead-managed both of Iraq’s debut sovereign bonds in 2017, the $1 billion Iraq 2.149% coupon 2022 USAID bond, and the $1 billion Iraq 6.75% coupon 2023 bond. The current 2019 budget law doesn’t include appropriations for a bond issuance, however there are a number of approved borrowings for infrastructure financing – mainly in the form of export credit agency (ECA) and development finance institutions (DFI) covered loans.[/size][/size]
[size=16]In the loan markets, we are seeing the entry of additional international financial institutions and a significant tightening of spreads for Iraq risk. On a recent trade, we saw Iraq credit spreads approach that of its single A-rated neighbors in the Arabian Gulf.
3) What are Iraq’s infrastructure needs following the long war? What is the cost to rebuild?
Iraq’s infrastructure is dilapidated due to the decades of wars and sanctions under the Saddam Hussein era. The change of regime and the lifting of sanctions in 2003 opened Iraq to the global markets and caused a significant increase in the imports of white goods by Iraq’s 40 million population and its burgeoning middle class, leading to a material increase in energy consumption that continues to require large investments.[/size]
[size=16]The Iraq-led and internationally-supported campaign against ISIS left large swaths of Iraqi territory in ruin, including its second largest city of Mosul with a population of nearly 2 million. Investments are required in other sectors including in water, transportation, education, health and housing. The snap back of sanctions on Iran, is both a forcing mechanism and an opportunity for the Government of Iraq to increase investments in domestic gas production and the capturing of gas-flaring for power generation.[/size]
[size=16]The World Bank and Government of Iraq estimate the initial cost of reconstruction for Iraq to be approximately $88 billion. Of this amount around $77 billion was to be financed by the Government of Iraq; with $50 billion coming from oil and other revenues, and $27 billion through ECA/DFI loans and capital markets issuances. [/size]
[size=16]However, the cost to rebuild is likely to be higher if one were to include the approximately $160 billion in investments that Iraq had appropriated in its annual investment budgets from 2015 to 2019 but had not spent.[/size]
[size=16]And, if one were to add the costs of reconstructing the damage caused by ISIS, this figure would be substantially higher.[/size]
[size=16]4) What is the best way to finance these needs in your opinion?[/size]
[size=16]Iraq has a number of financing tools available at its disposal, ranging from traditional short term trade finance to bank loans and capital markets as well as donor grants and soft loans via bilateral and multilateral agencies. [/size]
[size=16]Given the gargantuan infrastructure financing requirements, I believe the Government of Iraq would be well advised to tap all of the pockets of liquidity and financing tools available to it. Additionally, Iraq’s stakeholders pledged approximately $30 billion during the Iraq investment and reconstruction conference that was held in Kuwait in February 2018. [/size]
[size=16]Of this amount, approximately $23 billion are pledged in the form of ECA and DFI-covered loans. I believe the Government of Iraq would be prudent to take the necessary steps to convert these pledges into investments in its infrastructure. [/size]
[size=16]5) How interested are emerging markets and global markets investors in the Iraqi market?
The market appetite for Iraqi risk has improved significantly in the past couple of years. The Iraq 2023 bond that [size=16]Deutsche Bank lead-managed and which was 7-times oversubscribed at the time of issuance, is currently trading above par at $104 cash price, and 5.6% yield. [/size][/size]
[size=16]These are relatively tight spreads when compared to the 5-year bond yields of its oil-producing single B name peers—e.g. Angola at 5.80%; Gabon at 6.70% and Ecuador at 6.80% -- as well as the bond yields of non-oil single B economies of Jordan and Lebanon at 5.00% and 11.65% respectively. [/size]
[size=16]6) Iraq’s fiscal deficits are expected to rise over the medium term according to the IMF. What could be the best fiscal policy for Iraq in your opinion?[/size]
[size=16]Fiscal consolidation and the shrinking of the massive federal government’s balance sheet is probably the best fiscal policy.[/size]
[size=16]In reality, the trend has been going in the opposite direction, with the previous and the current Iraqi governments having succumbed to fiscal expansionary pressures during periods of robust oil prices. [/size]
[size=16]I believe that supporting private sector participation in the economy would bring efficiencies as well as shrink the government’s balance sheet. [/size]
[size=16]As an example, inviting private sector investors to the independent power producer (IPP) program has been successful in materially increasing by over 7-8 megawatts Iraq’s power generation capacity. [/size]
[size=16]In the end, I believe that in order for Iraq to move away from reliance on the ebb and flow of oil, it would benefit from the establishment of sovereign wealth funds focused on infrastructure and impact investments, as well as saving and growing some of its oil revenue proceeds for the benefit of future generations of Iraqis.[/size]
[size=16](Editing by Gerard Aoun)[/size]
[size=16][size=16]( gerard.aoun@refinitiv.com )[/size][/size]
[size=16]Any opinions expressed here are the author’s own.[/size]
[size=16]Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. [size=16]Read our full disclaimer policy here.[/size][/size]
[size=16][size=16] Opinion 2019
https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/markets/story/Market_appetite_for_Iraqi_risk_improves_significantly-ZAWYA20190728082433/
[/size]
[/size]
claud39- Elite Member
- Posts : 18423
Join date : 2018-11-04
Re: Moody's affirms Iraq's Caa1 ratings, maintains stable outlook
*****************
>>>TNTBS's YouTube Channel<<<
RamblerNash- GURU HUNTER
- Posts : 24270
Join date : 2015-02-19
Dinar Daily :: DINAR/IRAQ -- NEWS -- GURUS and DISCUSSIONS :: IRAQ and DINAR -- ARTICLE BASED INFORMATION and DISCUSSIONS
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Yesterday at 6:02 am by Ditartyn
» Dave Schmidt - Zim Notes for Purchase (NOT PHYSICAL NOTES)
Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:25 am by swizzlestick
» ZIGPLACE
Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:29 am by Zig
» CBD Vape Cartridges
Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:10 pm by Arendac
» Classic Tony is back
Tue Mar 05, 2024 2:53 pm by Mission1st
» THE MUSINGS OF A MADMAN
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:40 am by Arendac
» Minister of Transport: We do not have authority over any airport in Iraq
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:40 am by Verina
» Did Okie Die?
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:34 am by Arendac
» Hello all, I’m new
Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:46 pm by Jonny_5
» The Renfrows: Prophets for Profits, Happy Anniversary!
Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:46 pm by Mission1st
» What Happens when Cancer is treated with Cannabis? VIDEO
Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:58 am by MadisonParrish
» An Awesome talk between Tucker and Russell Brand
Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:16 am by kenlej
» Trafficking in children
Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:43 pm by kenlej
» The second American Revolution has begun, God Bless Texas
Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:13 pm by kenlej
» The Global Currency Reset Evolution Event Will Begin With Gold, Zimbabwe ZWR Old Bank Notes
Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:28 pm by Mission1st
» Tucker talking Canada
Wed Jan 24, 2024 6:50 pm by kenlej
» Almost to the end The goodguys are winning
Mon Jan 22, 2024 9:03 pm by kenlej
» Dinar Daily Facebook Page
Mon Jan 22, 2024 3:34 pm by Ponee
» The Fundamentals of Finance and Pimpy Live
Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:17 am by Dinarhater
» Why Won't the Iraqi Dinar Scam Die?
Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:19 pm by RamblerNash