Three experts to resolve the challenge the government budget 2017

Three experts to resolve the challenge the government budget 2017



Three experts to resolve the challenge the government budget 2017

30-05-2017 02:46 PM

Euphrates -
 
The Federal Supreme Court decided to elect an expert in the case challenged the government with some articles and paragraphs of the federal budget for the current year 2017, while received Daoyen to challenge questioning the Minister of Trade Agency and Planning Minister Salman al-Jumaili, and the postponement of consideration under the pretext of questioning the Minister of Agriculture Falah Hassan Zeidan.

According to a statement issued by the court that Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud presided over the Federal Supreme Court hearing, which was held yesterday in the presence of all its members considered a number of cases on its agenda. Adding that the first case concerned the appeal twenty-three articles of the general budget of the year 2017 law made the appeal of the Prime Minister in addition to his post against the President of the House of Representatives in addition to his job as the court decided to elect three experts in the field of budgets to submit their report regarding the financial aspects.

The statement pointed out that the experts' report will include the diagnosis of transfers or additions, whether adding a financial burden on the budget is a phenomenon in its terms, but will appear after the application, noting that the report also will answer the possibility of loss of those amendments or additions of budgetary resources, and whether the defendant in addition to his job may exceeded his constitutional powers. He said experts from their statement all transfers or add impact in the budget ceiling, following the meeting was postponed to the fifth of next month, for the purpose of submitting their report experts. The statement said that the court received Daoyen to challenge questioning the Minister of Trade and Acting Minister of Planning and the fact that the formal interrogation procedures meet constitutional conditions, and the evaluation of the facts it is the prerogative of the House of Representatives. The statement to postpone consideration of a case questioning the Minister of Agriculture until the fifth of next month to enable the agent of the defendant Chairman of the House of Representatives in addition to the function of the Report of the Prosecutor and the Minister of Agriculture documents questioning as ruled by the Federal Supreme Court should be inform the Minister questioner quizzed interrogation and isnaads.

The Prime Minister Abadi presented an appeal before the Federal Court of all transfers made by the House of Representatives on the 2017 budget year, which is estimated to be worth B280 billion dinars, including 54 billion dollars has to balance transfers were the House of Representatives. The government surprised the House by providing an appeal by 23 articles of the 2017 budget items, including a claim to cancel paragraph 15, and the reformulation of other paragraphs. The appeals included items contributed to the task included in the budget, to speed up the recognition process, as provisions petrodollar, claimed by the provinces, and a review of the oil licensing rounds for decades. The government also challenged the proportions allocated to the provinces border ports of revenues, and the allocation of the Peshmerga, which carved out of the military budget, in addition to the appeal clause provides for stopping appointments in the three presidencies, and the proportion of staff cuts that parliament plese to 3.8 percent instead of 4.8 percent. The current year's budget deficit of 106 trillion dinars 21 trillion dinars, 20 percent of the total budget.

http://www.alforat.info/index.php?page=article&id=46107