Dinar Daily
Welcome to Dinar Daily Discussions.

Logging in with your USERNAME allows you to participate in discussions, see what has recently been posted, and other options. Guests can post but they do have limited abilities.

We are NOT a guru forum. We are a dinarian forum. The opinions expressed on the forum do not reflect the of opinion of Dinar Daily specifically, but rather reflect the views of the individual posters only.

Disclamer:

We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."




Join Us for Dinar Discussions and More -- We Keep it REAL
 
HomeSearchMemberlistFAQLog inRegister
Help Us Drain the SWAMP in DINARLAND

REPORT TONY RENFROW for violating his Court Order to stay away from Dinar -

Judge's email: ksd_murguia_chambers@ksd.uscourts.gov
PHONE - 913-735-2340

DA's email: Scott.Rask@usdoj.gov
PHONE - 913-551-6730
DINAR INFORMATION LINKS

PARTNER SITES
Key Words
Adam Montana, AdminBill, Benjamin Fulford, Currency Exchange, David Schmidt, Dinar, Dinar Guru, Dinar Recaps, Dinar Rv, Dinar Scam, Dr Clarke, Frank26, Gary Larrabee, Gurus, Guru Hunters, JerzyBabkowski, Kaperoni, Kenny, Monetary Reform, Mnt Goat, My Ladies, Okie, Poppy, RamblerNash, Ray Renfrow, Redenomination, Revaluation, Ssmith, TNTBS, Tnt Tony, WING IT, We Are The People, Willis Clark, WSOMN, Yosef, Zap
Share | 
 

  "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Ssmith
GURU HUNTER
GURU HUNTER
avatar

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2012-04-10

PostSubject: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:33 am



We've all rented property in the past. Most standard lease agreements allow landlords to sell their rental units with and without notifying the tenant. Ever rented a property that was foreclosed on? It happens all the time. While every state has unique laws it can generally be stated that as long as your lease agreement is in force, and no special exception exists for a property sale, you're staying put. When the term of the lease is up you will have to renegotiate your lease with the new owner or move on. Bottom line is it's not an automatic transition. If a contract is in force the tenant has rights.

The same situation is in force for government contractors. Take a look at this example. NCMA, National Contract Management Association boasts 20,000 members. At their annual conference this past December, they honored members from every company, mostly major defense contractors, manufacturers like: Lockheed Martin, BAE, Geico, Amazon, and many more. Here's a link to their exhibitors list in the 2017 World Congress event: http://ncma.webvent.tv/sites/1.+World+Congress/2017+Event+Exhibitors

Every one of these companies are here because they have government contracts, or they are vying for contracts. They are fulfilling government services, federal, state and local.

For instance unemployment benefits in Texas was turned over to General Dynamics Corporation in 1998. I know this because I was involved in a major sale with the Texas Unemplyment Division when all of a sudden I was directed to General Dynamics. All the federal employees were laid off. How many government services are subcontracted out? There's no way to know. My guess is ALL OF THEM.

The question is constantly being asked, when will Common Law become the norm? This is a slow transition, obviously. One answer might be: how long will it be for these goverment contracts to expire? I bet that most of these large defense contractors, like GD in the "Texas Workforce Division", had an "Evergreen" clause in the contract. I know for a fact that General Dynamics did. Translation, without formal notice the contract would automatically continue, ad infinitum. Back in 1998 when General Dynamics won this contract I asked, how did you win this business without a formal bid? "We made a very compelling bid that saved the State of Texas money. It was easily done." As this example demonstrates, coupled with the continuation of these "outsourced services", The Good Ole Boy Network, is still alive and well and thriving.

Could it be that the NPTB don't want to rip the bandaid off too fast or possibly at all? Fact is, if it's true that US Inc was closed for business May 2015, and the sovereign US Republic took charge then how many of these contractors have been given notice that their Admiralty Law based Agreement was ended and the US Inc., no more? How many evergreen contracts have been ended and are floating on a month to month while decisions are made? Wow. It would be nice to know. The budget and details for all of these contractors falls under the OMB. Well, maybe, with a well written request under FOIA we can discover the full extent of these little known facts. Till then we can only watch and learn.

There must be massive, global education. There must be transparency given, more so than ever before. The word, "clandestine" has no place in a healthy, functioning society. We can understand and sympathize with the wage slaves delivering these government services as subcontractors, without federal benefits and salaries; earning less and working more. Been there, done that. We can provide a safety net to catch them when they step out into the light of day. We can meld and morph them into productive, lovely, loving people if given the chance. That's our jobs. It's what we signed up for. There are so, so many unproductive people, hating their jobs and their lives. It has an end in sight and we are IT.

We are RWA... Ready, Willing and Able and reporting for duty.

Big hugs and massive shoulders to carry the world, that's what we have and who we are. RWA.

Carden
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Ssmith
GURU HUNTER
GURU HUNTER
avatar

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2012-04-10

PostSubject: Re: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:34 am


"Re: Common Law vs. Admiralty Law" by John




There is a little item in “Contract Law” called “Full Disclosure.” This is explained in “Contract Law 101” that, “Without full disclosure a contract become null and void.” Such a contract is commonly referred to as an “Adhesion Contract.” I point this out because the type of “llaw” that has been practiced for the past one hundred plus years in America has NOT been totally Admiralty Law. It has actually been a combination of several forms of law…one of which is Roman Law. An example of Roman Law being imposed on Americans is in the use of ALL CAPITAL LETTERS for all government issued documents or licenses. Many believe this is merely a means of typing Corporate Documents and, while that may be technically and partially true, the reason for the use of ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is much deeper and more sinister. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, the Latin phrase “Capitis Diminutio” is how it is designated and, comes from Roman Law referring to "the use of capital letters for the purposes of diminishing the status of a citizen in society. It goes on to explain that there are actually three levels of Capitis Diminutio but, that the highest level is "Capitis Diminutio Maxima”, which is the use of all capital letters and, "this occurs when a citizen goes from being a free-man to becoming a slave.” Check out Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition Revised 1968. https://thelawdictionary.org/capitis-diminutio/

My reason for bringing that up is, that is a clear indication of “failure to disclose” or, lack of full disclosure and, thereby makes the contract null and void on its face. With that in mind, there is no need to go further into when contract end and new ones begin in many instances, since they for all intents and purposes were null and void from the beginning for lack of full disclosure.

John

https://thelawdictionary.org/capitis-diminutio/

What is CAPITIS DIMINUTIO?

In Roman law, A diminishing or abridgment of personality. Tills was a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications, following upon certain changes in his civil condition. It was of three kinds, enumerated as follows: Capitis diminutio maxima. The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. Capitis diminutio media. A lesser or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man lost his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights. Capitis diminutio minima. Tile lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 1G, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom. Law.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kevind53
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
avatar

Posts : 26765
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 18
Location : Umm right here!

PostSubject: Re: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:53 am

Gonna have to call BS on this one. First of all, Admiralty law only applies at sea. It is the body of law regarding maritime navigation, contracts, conduct, etc. In the US Admiralty law cases are tried in Federal civil courts. Civil Law covers and individuals rights as well as contracts, torts, property and family law. The USC is an example of this. Common Law is the uncodified body of law that is largely based on precedent. For that reason it is also sometimes called case law. The common laws to be applied to a case are decided by the presiding judge.

As far as capitis diminutio maxima, the writer is mostly correct in the meaning. I'm not sure where they get the all caps bit from. I suppose it is from the Latin word capitis, or capite, meaning by the head. Diminutio is a verb meaning to take away, so capitis diminutio means literally to take away the headship. There are three levels, maxima, the loss of liberty, citizenship, and family, media, the loss of citizenship and family without any forfeiture of personal liberty and minima, ceasing to belong to a particular family, without loss of liberty or citizenship. None are defined by the use of capital letters in whole or in part.

BTW the general use of the word Capitals in that way is actually a misuse. The proper terms are Majuscule and Minuscule if writing by hand, and Uppercase or Lowercase if setting type. Capitalization is the set of rules that governs how you apply the above to words.

Carden needs a clue ...

*****************
Trust but Verify --- R Reagan Suspect

"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you."1 Thessalonians 5:14–18

       
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Ssmith
GURU HUNTER
GURU HUNTER
avatar

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2012-04-10

PostSubject: Re: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:17 am


"Re: Common Law vs. Admiralty Law" by Vee




I am sort of in this position now... that of foreclosure and was in a sence a renter occupant... I have not on this forum erred my laundry.. my problems are my problems and not everybody else's I don't ask for handouts I don't look for charity I'm in my situation and I've got to deal with it.

It is sort of a long story but I'll try to make it short. I came into this house at least 10 years ago. The guy that owned home and I used to be roommates in apartment. He end up moving out to another place so he can say he could be closer to his children which was a farce. About a year or half a year later he file for bankruptcy and move back into the house that he had and was Leasing out. Being that I needed another roommate at the time of the appartment I contacted him and proposed I moved into his home with him to help share the expenses. Long story short the home ended up going into foreclosure. The first time around we sort of beat the bank with the help of another man. The bank came back again for foreclosure but this time the homeowner was too drunk and lazy to want to do his due diligence as i instructed him. So house is up for sale as I post this. The former presume owner abandoned the house a few months ago and moved or sponging off of a man that used to live with us. This Guy's daughter had moved in to the house early summer she is 17. The father had abandoned the house leaving his daughter in the home and had the power shut off and water to spit me. She has since moved to her aunt's house. Because she likes to smoke weed she won't go back to her mother's. I am now in this house without electric and water and taking adverse possession of the property. Being that nine-tenths of the law is possession... and the 1/10 is what...Equitable claim. By Statute they say that adverse possession is taking or making a hostel possession. I do not consider this hostile for the bank is presumed to have a Equitable right to the property. But according to Modern money mechanics et al. The Equitable position of the bank is fraudulent.. or without a valid consideration.

Over a week ago I tried to submit a claim to the property and record it in the county records of deeds but the clerks would not accept my instrument but said they would send it to legal department for validity. They said they did not recognize the terminology or language of my instrument. Legal said it was not in compliance wth article 9 of the real property procedure. I had made the claim by prescriptive in pedis posession, repossession of land. Legal department will not recognize language. So I've revamped it to the articles to which they say it needs to be in Conformity to.

I have no job I have no savings for I try to live my life out from underneath government sanctions.. To what the 99% of the population assumes one must live by. That one needs to have a Social Security number, one must have a registered vehicle, one must have a driver's license, et al. in order to provide the necessities of one's life, a roof over one's head, food on the table, heat and water.( side not..The 15thof April meaning nothing to me.. Since the last time I files a 1040 was in 96 or 7)

There is one that post they are living it.. you have no idea of what trying to live it is until you walk in my shoes for about 15 years..being 15 yrs in a form of concentration camp with no means to get out of it...

I admit I have been a little lackadaisical and slacking on my studies and should have had my instruments ready for this moment. But that is was irrelevant for I could not Implement my instruments until the drunk was removed from the property so that he could not try to spoung off of me any more and as I would have found out that what I had done in making a conveyance of real property buy claim of right was not in compliance.

So this week I researched and rewrote my conveyance instrument and tweaked it again today not knowing yet whether the clerk will accept it..and thus i must learn and figure out what my next step of action will be. But I believe I have the knowledge to coerce the clerk to fulfill their Duty.

The only thing I have hope for and live for is this RV..and what I'm going to do afterwards.

Vee ...out ..
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kevind53
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
avatar

Posts : 26765
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 18
Location : Umm right here!

PostSubject: Re: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:08 pm



*****************
Trust but Verify --- R Reagan Suspect

"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you."1 Thessalonians 5:14–18

       
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Ethel Biscuit
VIP Member
VIP Member
avatar

Posts : 1141
Join date : 2016-04-08
Location : This other Eden

PostSubject: Re: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:35 am

Vee wrote:
They said they did not recognize the terminology or language of my instrument.

I'm guessing the language is English, but it's hard to tell at some points.

question

*****************
Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)

Walt Whitman
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kevind53
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
avatar

Posts : 26765
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 18
Location : Umm right here!

PostSubject: Re: "Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18   Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:25 pm

ayestu

*****************
Trust but Verify --- R Reagan Suspect

"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you."1 Thessalonians 5:14–18

       
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 
"Common Law vs. Admiralty Law, When will the Transition Begin?" by Carden - 4/14/18
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Dinar Daily :: THE FAMILY ROOM :: GENERAL DISCUSSION-
Jump to: