Buy and Sell
- 18,95 $
Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:53 am
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Special Edition: Japanese Invasion of Pearl Harbor – FACT or FICTION?
So today I wanted to give everyone something to chew on. I am going to review a few aspects of what was said on a conference call by Jared Rand on March 22nd. I have talked about Jared many times already.
By now everyone should know that I do not support this notion of the RV through the GCR bullshit. So I don’t have to explicitly tell you again that I do not support this over zealous guy named Jared Rand. Do I? But one his recent conversations on the Dr. WC call was very interesting. So interesting that I thought it was worth mentioning and analyzing. Remember I try to listen to all these so called “intel” calls.
So on the Dr WC conference call with Jarad as her guest, I noticed that around the 1.5 minute mark he almost slips up and even uses the term “New World…….” but corrects himself and does not say “Order”. He wanted to say it and was about to say it. He stopped because he has read my newsletters and know the ramifications of using such language. This would tie him directly into the G.H and G.W. Bush’s administration to help bring about the “New World Order”, something that leaves us wondering about the implementation of the UN Agenda 2021 / 2030. So now he changes his wording to be safe.
Then as his presentation rolls on, he says that the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Imperial Japanese Navy on Dec 7th 1941 was really orchestrated by the US shadow or dark side of the government. This of course shocked me and I began to question his sanity. But then after telling this to my hubby, my hubby said why don’t you use your analysis abilities and try to debunk it. So here it is for you today.
I want everyone to know that this announcement of Jared was just as shocking to me as it will probably be to you. Many times I poo poo something just because I don’t understand how it could possibly be true but then later I find out it is. So let’s analyze it then and we will see. Is it FACT or FICTION?
So was the attack on Pearl Harbor on the morning of Dec 7th really carried out by the Japanese or the US Government? Why would the US government perpetrate such an act upon the American people? Lots of questions to ask so let’s see if we can make any sense of it all.
So what Jared is saying is - What if Japan never really attacked Pearl Harbor? If this is the case, like the NYC 911 attack on the Twin Towers, this would have to be the biggest cover up in history. We would literally have to re-do all these Hollywood movies and re-write the history books.
Jared says that the dark/shadow government from the US Aircraft carriers ordered the Rising Sun (a bright red sun and stripe) painted on the American fighters to mimic the Japanese Zero fighters. They ordered them to take off from sea and conduct the attack Pearl Harbor. He says they did this to “wake up the sleeping giant” and to get the US into the war. Well we do know this is partially true. The US did enter the war and it did wake us up.
So could people on the ground in Hawaii that morning on Dec 7th be just so surprised and shocked by taking cover and panicking, that upon looking up at the fighters, all they really saw was the very bright red Rising Sun dot and stripe on the fighter planes designating the Japanese Zero fighters? Even if you were an idiot you would surely know these are Japanese Zeros. Right?
But how many people who witnessed the attack that day could really recognize a Zero from any other fighter plane of the era, like from US figher planes?
What they probably really saw what instead may have been SBD-3 Dauntless, Grumman F4F-3, F4F-3A Wildcats, Douglas SBD-3 Dauntless or Douglas TBD-1 Devastators which were standard US fighters stationed on aircraft carriers during this time period.
Oh yes, they may have looked like Japanese fighter planes alright from the ground with the bright RED rising sun and stipe painted on the planes. Did the US paint these on the planes to fool us into thinking it was the Japanese invading?
We can compare this same thought process then to the case with NYC 911, where eye witnesses claim to have seen the actual 727 and 747 commercial planes. But did they really see what they thought they saw?
In 2001 large sized drones loaded with explosives may very well be what they witnessed. Almost all eye witnesses for 911 say it all happened so fast it was hard to realize just what happened. Of course like in Pearl Harbor, they too were in shock as it all happened so fast.
Then afterwards that day in 2001, the eye witness’s opinion was tainted when they watched in on television from the news media, when the govt provided source news reel to all the news media channels to show. They tell us that it was a live broadcast, especially when the second plane hit the tower, however this is not true and there was actually enough of a delay to dub in commercial airliners over the profile of the drone, just as they did for the attack on the first tower.
This could very well be the same case in Hawaii on Dec 7th only back them we did not have the technology to overlay on films and so any 16mm films were confiscated from that day simply disappeared, if they showed the actual profiles of any fighter planes. We didn’t even have television to show the attack on live TV. So, NYC 911 was a much easier one to fool people and pull off using current media devices than was the Pearl Harbor attack. I now this seems weird and absolutely impossible. But the story gets better and better when we look at the FACTS.
A link to WWII fighter plane recognition is below. It compares a US plane to the Japanese Zeros. So on Dec 7th 1941, do you think there were many of the eye witnesses on the ground that could actually be able to recognize a Japanese Zero for a US fighter plane? Probably not and the US was counting on this too. Would their attention not be focused more on the big RED DOT of the Rising Sun? So how many really knew enough to tell them apart? This US military training video below shows you how difficult it is.
I will review later why I feel this might have been impossible to do but for now just entertain the possibility okay and be open minded.
We see that from all the FACTUAL evidence of the NYC 911 attack, that they can actually fake an attack of this magnitude and get away with it again after almost half a century of Pearl. Yes, history just may have repeated itself. So maybe in 1941 this idea of Jared’s is not too far-fetched after all?
This is the short version of the “official” story of Dec 7th, presented by the US govt to the American people. Is it FACT or FICTION?
Give me chance to explain. These are some interesting FACTS to consider before you discredit all the evidence. Let’s look at it.
1)At this time of the Pearl Harbor attack, the general public in the USA still refused to go along with supporting yet another World War. It was felt we were pressured to get involved in WWI and lost a lot of lives needlessly, however the real FACTS show that the influenza virus killed the majority of US soldiers during that war anyhow. However perception is everything and always overrides common sense.
So the president of the US FDR was having a problem turning the attention to fighting and committing American lives, supplies and equipment to fighting in the new war. FDR was grasping for solutions. Great Britain was at the brink of being defeated by Germany and we knew that if GB was defeated it would make it very difficult, if not impossible, for an eventual all out invasion of the European continent to defeat the Nazis.
Quickly after the Pearl Harbor attack, on December 8, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) asked Congress for and received a declaration of war against Japan. On December 11, Germany and Italy, allied with Japan, declared war on the U.S. The United States had entered World War II.
2) Why did the three carriers assigned to the Pacific fleet escape devastation? After all the Japs were more likely to go after the carriers then these older battleships? Right? They knew that it is the carriers that would win the war in the pacific. Was it just coincidental that the carriers were out at sea during the attack?
On 7 December 1941, the U.S. Navy had seven total aircraft carriers (CVs). Out of the seven three of them were in the Pacific fleet - the USS Lexington, USS Saratoga and the USS Ranger.
History will tell you that the aircraft carriers were moved out of Pearl Harbor just a short time before the attack occurred on the morning of Dec 7th. Is this true?
On Dec 7th 1941, the USS Saratoga was just entering San Diego after an interim dry docking at Bremerton, Washington. So we can eliminate this ship on any part of the conspiracy. So it was way out of harms way long before the attack.
On Dec 7th 1941, the USS Ranger was returning to Norfolk, Virginia from an ocean patrol extending to Port-of-Spain, Trinidad, British West Indies when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. So we can eliminate this ship on any part of the conspiracy. So it was way out of harms way long before the attack.
So on Dec 7th, 1941 this leaves only one (1) carrier to carry out the conspiracy attack on Pearl Harbor. How many planes could the Lexington then carry onboard? We see that the Lexington only held 44 combat fighters as listed below. So where in hell did the other 309 fighter planes come from as the US govt “official story claims that 353 Jap Zeros attacked Pearly Harbor (353-44 = 309)? We see the Lexington could not hold that many planes.
Bombing Squadron Two (VB-2) with 15 Douglas SBD-2 Dauntless
Fighting Squadron Two (VF-2) with 16 Brewster F2A-3 Buffalos
Scouting Squadron Two (VS-2) with 1 Douglas SBD-2 and 14 SBD-3 Dauntless
Torpedo Squadron Two (VT-2) with 12 Douglas TBD-1 Devastators
The history books claim that Saratoga and the Ranger were also out on maneuvers along with the Lexington and we know now this simply is not true, as you can see from the FACTS of my research.
So this is the “official” US govt story - Upon learning of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the USS Lexington launched search planes to hunt for the Japanese fleet, and at midmorning headed south to rendezvous with USS Indianapolis (CA-35) and USS Enterprise (CV-6) task forces to conduct a search SOUTHWEST of Oahu until returning to Pearl Harbor on 13 December. Is this really what happened or just a cover-up story for the attack, thus explaining why the ships were positioned where they were on Dec 7th?
Could the 44 fighter planes from the Lexington actually just circle around and around again over Pearl making many several attack runs, as they attacked the bay area making it appear to be more planes than there actually were? So what was witnessed on the ground and testified to later, may not actually have occurred. Also the 353 Jap planes comes strictly from the records of the accused 4 Japanese carriers that supposedly were in the battle. This was inserted into the history books afterwards and not from actual footage on film. So I ask again - Where the 353 Japanese Zero fighter planes in FACT even actually there?
So this the official story for the whereabouts of the USS Lexington: “In order to augment the air defenses for Midway Island, USS Lexington departed Pearl Harbor on 5 Dec (just 2 days prior to the attack) with Vought SB2U-3 Vindicators of Marine Scouting Bombing Squadron Two and (VMSB-231) aboard. Along with the heavy cruisers USS Chicago (CA-29), USS Portland (CA-33) and USS Astoria (CA-34) and five destroyers, the Lexington formed Task Force 12”.
Could the USS Lexington have rendezvoused with the other two carriers at sea thus the three US carriers conducting the battle against Pearl Harbor first and then headed for Midway as the alibi? Just asking…..We see that this is FACT was not the case from the records I researched. The Saratoga and Ranger were not even close to Pearl.
Could then the one carrier namely Lexington, carry enough planes to carry out the attack on Pearl Harbor?
Yes, since the US claims that 353 – 360 aircraft were launched from four heavy Japanese carriers. But we know the Lexington could have easily done all the damage in a surprise attack with only 44 planes with multiple waves and passes. I also want to state there was massive confusion on the ground and 44 circling planes could have looked like repetitive wave after wave of Zeros. We can see how this might have looked like hundreds and hundreds of zeros. Just stating a possibility.
If you watch the video on the link I provided above from the “official” story line from the US govt, it is just too specific with too many details. Too specific always sets off a red flag in my mind, as they had to try to convince everyone and make it sound plausible. Just like the “official” story of 911 it is too easy to poke holes in it.
3)Also we know that the long-standing concept of battleships duking it out on the open seas for superiority was already an antiquated method of warfare as the that aircraft carrier was now taking over the means of naval see superiority (and has been this ever since). A skeptic might say the shiny aircraft carriers - which the U.S. Navy understood would be pivotal in the next war - along with these newer class of battleships, were absent because they knew how enticing Pearl Harbor was as an ambush point. But was this the real reason? .
On December 7, 1941, the US Navy numbered 17 battleships with a further 15 under construction.
At Pearl Harbor on Dec 7th the battleships were the oldest battleships in the fleet. They were mostly WWI and early 20's vintage ships. The ones in the Atlantic were the newer battleships. Is this true?
So out of the 15 commissioned and in-service battleships at the time 8 were in Pearly Harbor on Dec 7th. These were all 18-27 years old already and reflected just half the fleet of these "super-dreadnoughts".
We also see that the majority of the battleship moorings in the harbor were in water depths of only around 30-40 feet. Ships, if sunk, at this depths, could easily be refloated, repaired and put back in service. There is always a cost of a conspiracy but the cost of not going to out weight the cost of not getting involved in the war. I believe the risk was minimal that the planned attack could not really cripple the pacific fleet for very long, as it didn’t. But this was not the point of the conspiracy in the first place. They point was to get the US into the war. Beside if this attack was a conspiracy, then the pilots would know each exact ship positions in the harbor and attacked just the right ones as planned for their targets, thus damage was limited and predicted as planned.
We later see this reinforced in WWII when during the battle to get the German Bismarck Battleship and how easy it was to sink it. So knowing all this, could the US then afford to sacrifice a couple battleships in the attack to get America onboard with supporting the war? These large battleships were all sitting in the Pearly Harbor like ducks in a pond waiting to be picked off. Was this intentional? So why give orders for the Aircraft Carriers and not the Battleships to move out of the harbor? I think I explained why already.
Pennsylvania BB-38 Damaged gun, lead ship of the Pennsylvania class of United States Navy super-dreadnought battleships. commissioned on 12 June 1916,
Arizona BB-39 Sunk, total loss, ship was the second and last of the Pennsylvania class of "super-dreadnought" battleships. Although commissioned in 1916
Nevada BB-36 Seriously damaged, beached at Hospital Point, Nevada-class battleships. Launched in 1914
Oklahoma BB-37 Sunk, total loss, another Nevada-class battleship, Commissioned in 1916
Tennessee BB-43 Relatively minor damage, repaired by February 1942, Tennessee-class battleship, commissioned June 1920.
California BB-44 Sunk, floated, rebuilt by January 1944, Tennessee-class battleship, commissioned August 1921.
Maryland BB-46 Damaged, two bomb hits, repaired by February 26, 1942, Colorado-class battleship, commissioned July 1921
West Virginia BB-48 Sunk, floated, rebuilt by July 1944, Colorado-class battleship, commissioned December 1923
4)History tells us that the US did not actually know just where the Imperial Japanese fleet was located. At least this is what Hollywood tells us. This is not FACT is not actually true.
We did actually know where the fleet was located, as Australia was tracking the fleet and had notified the US just days prior to the Dec 7th attack where the fleet was located. Japan was actually planning an all out invasion on Australia but decided to cancel it. So the Japanese fleet was way too far from Pearl to have orchestrated the attack on it. So where did all these Japanese fighters come from? Just asking.
5) Japanese Type 00 Carrier Fighter ("Zero") that crashed at Fort Kamehameha, near Pearl Harbor, during the attack. This plane, which had tail code "A1-154" and a red band around its rear fuselage, came from the aircraft carrier Akagi. Was this actually a captured Zero fighter or was it a staged crash with an actual captured Zero from an already salvaged zero fighter plane? How many fighters did they actually shoot down over Hawaii on the day?
6) They say the attack killed 2,403 U.S. personnel, including 68 civilians, and destroyed or damaged 19 U.S. Navy ships, including 8 battleships. Is this the real body count or just an “acceptable” range of deaths. We know that the US govt does have acceptable levels of casualties. But then if you go to the link I provided, you can see later on they give you a higher body count on a more detailed table. Why is there a discrepancy? Is it because the body count was actually much higher but they did not want the American public to know since if the TRUTH even came out what would they say? The actually body count turns out to be just about what the NYC 911 attack “official” figures turn out to be. Is this then the “acceptable” level of deaths for this size event by the shadow/dark government?
7) The link below is used as the “official” US govt movie reel from the attack on Pearly Harbor on Dec 7th, 1941:
After the battle of Pearly Harbor was over the US govt confiscated all films taken of the attack. They claimed they wanted the films to study and use as evidence of the Japanese attack. What where they looking for on these films? The only films ever returned to the owners where the ones without any actual airplanes shown on the film. Go figure? Just stating a possibility.
Do you actually see any Japanese zero fighters on any of the standard films released by the govt? Do you actually see any closeups of any fighter planes? Yet the US Govt claims that 353 Japanese planes were launched and attacked Pearly Harbor? Yet not one caught on film with any detail to actually positively identify even one of them? I find this very hard to believe.
Yes, there were planes on the films but for some reason the govt does not want you to see them. Why do this if they would only show Zeros fighters from the enemy?
Instead what do you see? Just destruction and later some propaganda in Japan itself. No real footage of the Zeros attacking. But Hollywood did a fine job of making their own film based only on the “official” story as told by the US govt. So these movies then become reality. Yes, these movies do show Zero fighters and are positively identified, but this is Hollywood and not actual real life footage. Get it? They simply brainwash you.
If you watch the govt film, you will see films of inside Japan. Really? Please tell me then how does that last bit of film gets attached to the home-grown 16mm movie real supposedly taken on the morning of Dec7th? Makes you wonder. Is this a staged film? But this is the “official” film of the attack in the government archives that documents the attack. We are expected to just accept it. This is also the film that is usually dubbed into many of the Hollywood version of the films later on.
8) Is then the Hollywood movie called Tora Tora a propaganda film? Yes, there are actual military personnel and war veterans explaining the devastation and giving their account to you what they saw on Dec 7th . There is no doubt that like the NYC 911 attack, that the attack on Pearly Harbor did occur and it was devastating, but did anyone definitively actually see Japanese Zero fighters drop any bombs? We simply can’t be sure.
Okay are you convinced yet that something is very fishy?
But Jared Rand still has some more explaining to do. Here are some other FACTS that may dispute his claim of a US led attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec 7th, 1941:
1)The Japanese actually lost 29 aircraft and 5 midget submarines in the attack. The navy even captured one of the midget submarines. But we know that these midget subs had been spotted already weeks before any attack. So they may in fact have nothing to do with the attack.
2)A downed Japanese pilot was taken prisoner and there was a crashed Zero fighter. Was this an intentional crash of a captured Zero flown for this very purpose to provide false evidence? Hey they did it in the NYC 91 bombings when they somehow found clean passports on three of the terrorists on top of the mounds of burned rubble. Really?
3)Soon after the morning of Dec 7th, the Japanese propaganda released a news real in Japan about their attack. Below is the link to the captured news reel after the defeat of Japan. So was this actually broadcasted on Dec 7th or was this a fake film produced afterwards as a cover up to reinforce the conspiracy that Japan did actually attack? Remember the US occupied Japan at the time this film was released.
4) The Pursuit Officer on duty Dec 7th was Lieutenant Kermit Tyler, an army air forces pilot. It was his second day on the job and he thought that the planes spotted on radar were US Army air force B-17 heavy bombers on their way to Hickam Field from California. Little did he know they very well could have been US fighter planes from the carrier offshore and not Japanese Zeros. We will never know with a recorded visual. So this evidence is convenient to the conspiracy.
From my research I really wanted to explore the possibility that Jared might be correct. But for me I now can say I don’t know. He may be correct. Therefore, if anyone has any other evidence to suggest I am wrong in my findings then please step forward.
Their words not mine…..No Rumors, No Hype, No Opinions ,,,,,
Just the FACTS!
Disclaimer: All information in this newsletter is not intended for investment decisions / purposes. Mnt Goat is not a financial analyst, planner, banker, attorney or associated in any role with giving out professional investment advice.
In ending I want everyone to know your constant prayers in the fight against evil (ISIS) in Iraq have worked. God has guided these young men and women on the battle field. Let us all now also keep praying. I have composed a prayer maybe we can all pray today in our own way and until the revaluation occurs.
“For the Iraqi Prime Minister and the President of the United States, that all their cabinet members, and deputies may be anointed by the Holy Spirit to do God’s will and bring the free Republic of Iraq and the United States to the much-deserved prosperity and abundance thru justice and freedom from oppression and corruption”. That they may be a shining example for the rest of the middle east and the world to follow. In the name of Jesus Christ our King and Savior, Amen”
Much love to ya all,
- GURU HUNTER
- Posts : 17157
Join date : 2015-02-19
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum