Dinar Daily
Welcome to Dinar Daily Discussions.

Logging in with your USERNAME allows you to participate in discussions, see what has recently been posted, and other options. Guests can post but they do have limited abilities.

We are NOT a guru forum. We are a dinarian forum. The opinions expressed on the forum do not reflect the of opinion of Dinar Daily specifically, but rather reflect the views of the individual posters only.

Disclamer:

We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."


Get Daily Updates of the NEWS & GURUS in your EMAIL
CHECK YOUR EMAIL for VERIFICATION

Enter your email address:

"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17 DinarDailyUpdates?bg=330099&fg=FFFFFF&anim=1

"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17

Go down

"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17 Empty "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17

Post by RamblerNash on Wed May 03, 2017 11:28 pm


"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17 PastedImage%2B%25283%2529

In reply to 

http://www.dinardaily.net/t63115-judges-intel-update-real-news-by-mr-ed-5-2-17


Everyone in dinarland and beyond.....

This is fake - a rumor which will NEVER be substantiated - no matter how stridently they may argue about the "real" 13th Amendment to the US Constitution ( referring to the first attempted 13th amendment, which was not ratified according to law), or otherwise.

Hey Mr. Ed.... CITE THE CASE!!! No, I don't mean the website editorial you got this from. Cite to us all the court and case number where ANY such order was made - let alone, one that binds all jurisdictions.

Hey, where's thelucky1 (or whatever his 35 years as a lawyer's name is), why not step up and ask the questions which will kill this fake-news? What, too "negative" for you to dispel obvious nonsense? Or, will you be confirming you're a British Agent? LOL

Funny, my profile is (at least, demographically) very similar to thelucky1 (sorry, didn't take time to look up your pen name). Different from his profile is that I still use the skills acquired over the years in analysis and critical thinking (no, that does not equate to "being negative" even though some of the thoughtless among us might say). Oh, only one point on that last post "ubiety, ubiety, ubiety"... you had a lot to say, but nothing coherent about my refutations. Go figure.

I know I'm not an "agent of a foreign" and the bar in my state is not a subsidiary of an ancient legal society in England. Good grief. It's astounding that anyone ever believed this carried water. I suppose "lawyer-hate" can go a long way to motivate deeply confused thinking.

Anyway, this kind of fake-fact based reporting is annoying and should stop. Fantasy thinking substituted for real, honest facts doesn't make you ascended or "5D", it makes you pathetic - even if you're intelligent enough to sound erudite. Get a grip.

Stay grounded people.

I am,

ubiety

P.S. So hey, what's up with "grandfather" or "elders" telling us last weekend (naturally, via a guru) that "come hell or high water" the RV/GCR was happening and we would have spendable funds Monday of this week? No, no one has actually explained why "that source" is no longer credible or why, even if it "really is grandfather" why we're not simply dealing with a fickle authority who refuses to keep commitments. Or, maybe the messenger was unreliable - it's hard to keep that straight with the confusion over the last year of promises failed. Given the magnitude of what has been spoken as "information from "the source", it's not bit "impatient" or "greedy" to ask about why these new "powers that be" are so untrue to their commitments (and yes, they have made many commitments - well, if you listen to the gurus.)
RamblerNash
RamblerNash
GURU HUNTER
GURU HUNTER

Posts : 17324
Join date : 2015-02-19

Back to top Go down

"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17 Empty Re: "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17

Post by roxy22222222 on Wed May 03, 2017 11:55 pm

Here is Mr. Ed lol! "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17 Giphy
roxy22222222
roxy22222222
GURU HUNTER
GURU HUNTER

Posts : 2881
Join date : 2015-04-20

Back to top Go down

"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17 Empty Re: "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17

Post by ubiety on Thu May 04, 2017 1:20 am

HEY!!!  That's equestrian hate speech!  How insulting!!   :winky winky:
ubiety
ubiety
New Member
New Member

Posts : 12
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum