Dinar Daily
Welcome to Dinar Daily Discussions.

Logging in with your USERNAME allows you to participate in discussions, see what has recently been posted, and other options. Guests can post but they do have limited abilities.

We are NOT a guru forum. We are a dinarian forum. The opinions expressed on the forum do not reflect the of opinion of Dinar Daily specifically, but rather reflect the views of the individual posters only.


We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

Join Us for Dinar Discussions and More -- We Keep it REAL
HomeSearchMemberlistFAQLog inRegister
Help Us Drain the SWAMP in DINARLAND

REPORT TONY RENFROW for violating his Court Order to stay away from Dinar -

Judge's email: ksd_murguia_chambers@ksd.uscourts.gov
PHONE - 913-735-2340

DA's email: Scott.Rask@usdoj.gov
PHONE - 913-551-6730

Key Words
Adam Montana, AdminBill, Benjamin Fulford, Currency Exchange, David Schmidt, Dinar, Dinar Guru, Dinar Recaps, Dinar Rv, Dinar Scam, Dr Clarke, Frank26, Gary Larrabee, Gurus, Guru Hunters, JerzyBabkowski, Kaperoni, Kenny, Monetary Reform, Mnt Goat, My Ladies, Okie, Poppy, RamblerNash, Ray Renfrow, Redenomination, Revaluation, Ssmith, TNTBS, Tnt Tony, WING IT, We Are The People, Willis Clark, WSOMN, Yosef, Zap
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Share | 

 "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17

Go down 

Posts : 14067
Join date : 2015-02-19

PostSubject: "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17   Wed May 03, 2017 11:28 pm

In reply to 


Everyone in dinarland and beyond.....

This is fake - a rumor which will NEVER be substantiated - no matter how stridently they may argue about the "real" 13th Amendment to the US Constitution ( referring to the first attempted 13th amendment, which was not ratified according to law), or otherwise.

Hey Mr. Ed.... CITE THE CASE!!! No, I don't mean the website editorial you got this from. Cite to us all the court and case number where ANY such order was made - let alone, one that binds all jurisdictions.

Hey, where's thelucky1 (or whatever his 35 years as a lawyer's name is), why not step up and ask the questions which will kill this fake-news? What, too "negative" for you to dispel obvious nonsense? Or, will you be confirming you're a British Agent? LOL

Funny, my profile is (at least, demographically) very similar to thelucky1 (sorry, didn't take time to look up your pen name). Different from his profile is that I still use the skills acquired over the years in analysis and critical thinking (no, that does not equate to "being negative" even though some of the thoughtless among us might say). Oh, only one point on that last post "ubiety, ubiety, ubiety"... you had a lot to say, but nothing coherent about my refutations. Go figure.

I know I'm not an "agent of a foreign" and the bar in my state is not a subsidiary of an ancient legal society in England. Good grief. It's astounding that anyone ever believed this carried water. I suppose "lawyer-hate" can go a long way to motivate deeply confused thinking.

Anyway, this kind of fake-fact based reporting is annoying and should stop. Fantasy thinking substituted for real, honest facts doesn't make you ascended or "5D", it makes you pathetic - even if you're intelligent enough to sound erudite. Get a grip.

Stay grounded people.

I am,


P.S. So hey, what's up with "grandfather" or "elders" telling us last weekend (naturally, via a guru) that "come hell or high water" the RV/GCR was happening and we would have spendable funds Monday of this week? No, no one has actually explained why "that source" is no longer credible or why, even if it "really is grandfather" why we're not simply dealing with a fickle authority who refuses to keep commitments. Or, maybe the messenger was unreliable - it's hard to keep that straight with the confusion over the last year of promises failed. Given the magnitude of what has been spoken as "information from "the source", it's not bit "impatient" or "greedy" to ask about why these new "powers that be" are so untrue to their commitments (and yes, they have made many commitments - well, if you listen to the gurus.)
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online

Posts : 2874
Join date : 2015-04-20

PostSubject: Re: "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17   Wed May 03, 2017 11:55 pm

Here is Mr. Ed lol!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
New Member
New Member

Posts : 12
Join date : 2017-01-17

PostSubject: Re: "Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17   Thu May 04, 2017 1:20 am

HEY!!!  That's equestrian hate speech!  How insulting!!   :winky winky:
Back to top Go down
View user profile
"Response to Judges by Mr. Ed" by ubiety - 5.3.17
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
Post new topic   Reply to topicJump to: