Dinar Daily
Welcome to Dinar Daily Discussions.

Logging in with your USERNAME allows you to participate in discussions, see what has recently been posted, and other options. Guests can post but they do have limited abilities.

We are NOT a guru forum. We are a dinarian forum. The opinions expressed on the forum do not reflect the of opinion of Dinar Daily specifically, but rather reflect the views of the individual posters only.

Disclamer:

We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."


Get Daily Updates of the NEWS & GURUS in your EMAIL
CHECK YOUR EMAIL for VERIFICATION

Enter your email address:

Is Syria the war we wanted? And is our almost invisible force structure there a reason for perverse optimism? DinarDailyUpdates?bg=330099&fg=FFFFFF&anim=1

Is Syria the war we wanted? And is our almost invisible force structure there a reason for perverse optimism?

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Go down

Is Syria the war we wanted? And is our almost invisible force structure there a reason for perverse optimism? Empty Is Syria the war we wanted? And is our almost invisible force structure there a reason for perverse optimism?

Post by Ponee on Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:01 pm

Is Syria the war we wanted? And is our almost invisible force structure there a reason for perverse optimism? 109405799_208fd2228d_b



As I look at American force structure for the Syrian war, I wonder if this is actually the way we should have been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

My impression is that it is a combination of air strikes, Special Ops raids, and CIA Special Activities Division work with other players, is doing quite a lot of damage to ISIS. On top of that, political cohesion is demonstrated by high-profile but relatively ineffective bombing by allies. This is high impact, low profile. There are no big permanent bases in Syria with salsa nights, fun runs, and ice cream stands for hordes of FOBBITs. And no big conventional units stomping all over the place without a real idea of what they should be doing.

Rather, this operation has a footprint so light as to be almost invisible. It appears to be having a genuine effect. If I were inclined to military rhyming, I would say that the combined effect is that ISIS is being “racked and stacked.”

As the president said with a certain amount of satisfaction this week, “You know, when I said no boots on the ground, I think the American people understood generally that we’re not going to do an Iraq-style invasion of Iraq or Syria with battalions that are moving across the desert.” (Simultaneous translation: “Hey, I figured out the American people don’t care as long as the presence is small, and not on the front pages.”)

Indeed, what we are doing now is almost an American version of the Iranian presence in Iraq, 2005 to 2009. And they now run a big part of Iraq. I still would like to read a study of the Iranian presence in Iraq — it strikes me as a model of a training, advisory and surgical strike operation (TASSO).

No wonder word on the street has it that Gen. Joseph Votel, currently the chief of Special Operations Command, will be the next commander of Central Command, the U.S. military headquarters for operations in the Middle East.




 LINK

*****************
Ponee
Ponee
Admin
Admin

Posts : 35739
Join date : 2011-08-09

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum