Latest topics
To stem ISIL advance, US must clarify Syria strategy
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
To stem ISIL advance, US must clarify Syria strategy
The recent losses incurred by ISIL at the hands of Kurdish forces in northern Syria do not necessarily indicate a weakening of the terror group.
The capture of Ain Issa just 55km from the extremist’s stronghold of Raqqa and the fall of Tal Abyad on the Syrian-Turkish border were clearly important victories. But they follow an established pattern of gains and losses in the war against ISIL that are unlikely to result in seismic shifts on the ground.
Most of the Kurdish-majority territory lost to ISIL last year has been recaptured and continuing the offensive towards Raqqa and into Arab areas is unlikely.
Ten months after the United States vowed to destroy the group, the militants remain far from extinction, and appear to be growing.
ISIL’s dramatic gains in Ramadi and Palmyra in May put the spotlight on the effectiveness of US-led airstrikes and raised doubts about the Obama administration’s handling of the war effort.
“Just because somebody in Washington DC says the United States has a strategy, doesn’t mean we actually have a strategy,” said Christopher Harmer, senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War. “There’s a huge difference between what we’re saying and what the United States is actually doing.”
Since the campaign against ISIL began last August, the US-led coalition has launched more than 4,200 airstrikes, killing more than 10,000 ISIL fighters according to US officials.
However, data from the Institute for the Study of War shows that the vast majority of airstrikes have been in frontline battles on the fringes of ISIL territory, such as Kobani, with less than 50 airstrikes hitting its key centres Raqqa and Mosul.
“What we are actually doing is applying a minor amount of military pressure around the periphery of ISIL to make sure they don’t expand any further,” Mr Harmer said, adding that American action is currently geared towards containing ISIL rather than destroying it.
One key setback in the US air campaign is the lack of partners on the ground to provide intelligence to strike at ISIL beyond the frontlines, said Joshua Landis, Syria expert at the University of Oklahoma.
“The most prolific bombing is in front of various military campaigns, where they have spotters calling in airstrikes on ISIL positions,” he said. But the campaign lacks intelligence on targets from deep inside ISIL-held territory, Mr Landis added.
ISIL’s exceptional ability to blend in among civilians also makes it difficult for the US and its coalition partners to identify targets, Mr Harmer said.
“If you’re trying to bomb fighters who are mobile, intermixing with the population, there are only very brief windows of opportunity to hit those guys without killing civilians,” he said.
Washington’s preference to contain ISIL is also largely linked to its policy in Syria, and its desire to see President Bashar Al Assad removed from power. The US position on Syria is “confused”, Mr Landis said, as Washington tries to juggle priorities between fighting ISIL and pressuring Mr Al Assad.
“The United States sees Assad as an enemy, they’re trying to crush him through economic sanctions, and weaken him by supporting his enemies. This opens the door to ISIL.”
The US refrained from targeting ISIL during its battles with Mr Al Assad’s forces, most notably in Palmyra. “ISIL had surrounded the city and was sitting in the desert for three days where the US could’ve attacked it … they decided to let ISIL take it,” he said.
Washington’s key problem in Syria, Mr Landis said, is that it has no loyal partners on the ground, and opposes the three main forces – Assad, the Army of Conquest consisting of Al Qaeda’s Syria affiliate, and ISIL. While the Kurds have been a success story for the US in the country’s north-east, they cannot be expected to advance on ISIL deep into Arab territory.
“The US strategy of using the Kurds to roll back ISIL in Syria has come to an end because the Kurds have taken all of their territory,” Mr Landis said.
Although many rejoiced at the Kurdish victory in Tal Abyad, the disparate results in previous weeks on the various fronts against ISIL only further expose the lack of a clear, coherent US strategy to tackle the ISIL threat.
“The Kurds are getting a lot out of this American aid, the Iraqis are frustrated, and Assad is of course getting zero,” Mr Landis said.
Both analysts agree that the US will not be able to deal a death blow to ISIL until it finds reliable ground partners able to do its bidding, and adopts a clear policy on the Syrian conflict to avoid further ISIL advances.
foreign.desk@thenational.ae
http://www.thenational.ae/world/americas/to-stem-isil-advance-us-must-clarify-syria-strategy?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
The capture of Ain Issa just 55km from the extremist’s stronghold of Raqqa and the fall of Tal Abyad on the Syrian-Turkish border were clearly important victories. But they follow an established pattern of gains and losses in the war against ISIL that are unlikely to result in seismic shifts on the ground.
Most of the Kurdish-majority territory lost to ISIL last year has been recaptured and continuing the offensive towards Raqqa and into Arab areas is unlikely.
Ten months after the United States vowed to destroy the group, the militants remain far from extinction, and appear to be growing.
ISIL’s dramatic gains in Ramadi and Palmyra in May put the spotlight on the effectiveness of US-led airstrikes and raised doubts about the Obama administration’s handling of the war effort.
“Just because somebody in Washington DC says the United States has a strategy, doesn’t mean we actually have a strategy,” said Christopher Harmer, senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War. “There’s a huge difference between what we’re saying and what the United States is actually doing.”
Since the campaign against ISIL began last August, the US-led coalition has launched more than 4,200 airstrikes, killing more than 10,000 ISIL fighters according to US officials.
However, data from the Institute for the Study of War shows that the vast majority of airstrikes have been in frontline battles on the fringes of ISIL territory, such as Kobani, with less than 50 airstrikes hitting its key centres Raqqa and Mosul.
“What we are actually doing is applying a minor amount of military pressure around the periphery of ISIL to make sure they don’t expand any further,” Mr Harmer said, adding that American action is currently geared towards containing ISIL rather than destroying it.
One key setback in the US air campaign is the lack of partners on the ground to provide intelligence to strike at ISIL beyond the frontlines, said Joshua Landis, Syria expert at the University of Oklahoma.
“The most prolific bombing is in front of various military campaigns, where they have spotters calling in airstrikes on ISIL positions,” he said. But the campaign lacks intelligence on targets from deep inside ISIL-held territory, Mr Landis added.
ISIL’s exceptional ability to blend in among civilians also makes it difficult for the US and its coalition partners to identify targets, Mr Harmer said.
“If you’re trying to bomb fighters who are mobile, intermixing with the population, there are only very brief windows of opportunity to hit those guys without killing civilians,” he said.
Washington’s preference to contain ISIL is also largely linked to its policy in Syria, and its desire to see President Bashar Al Assad removed from power. The US position on Syria is “confused”, Mr Landis said, as Washington tries to juggle priorities between fighting ISIL and pressuring Mr Al Assad.
“The United States sees Assad as an enemy, they’re trying to crush him through economic sanctions, and weaken him by supporting his enemies. This opens the door to ISIL.”
The US refrained from targeting ISIL during its battles with Mr Al Assad’s forces, most notably in Palmyra. “ISIL had surrounded the city and was sitting in the desert for three days where the US could’ve attacked it … they decided to let ISIL take it,” he said.
Washington’s key problem in Syria, Mr Landis said, is that it has no loyal partners on the ground, and opposes the three main forces – Assad, the Army of Conquest consisting of Al Qaeda’s Syria affiliate, and ISIL. While the Kurds have been a success story for the US in the country’s north-east, they cannot be expected to advance on ISIL deep into Arab territory.
“The US strategy of using the Kurds to roll back ISIL in Syria has come to an end because the Kurds have taken all of their territory,” Mr Landis said.
Although many rejoiced at the Kurdish victory in Tal Abyad, the disparate results in previous weeks on the various fronts against ISIL only further expose the lack of a clear, coherent US strategy to tackle the ISIL threat.
“The Kurds are getting a lot out of this American aid, the Iraqis are frustrated, and Assad is of course getting zero,” Mr Landis said.
Both analysts agree that the US will not be able to deal a death blow to ISIL until it finds reliable ground partners able to do its bidding, and adopts a clear policy on the Syrian conflict to avoid further ISIL advances.
foreign.desk@thenational.ae
http://www.thenational.ae/world/americas/to-stem-isil-advance-us-must-clarify-syria-strategy?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Ponee- Admin
- Posts : 38267
Join date : 2011-08-09
Re: To stem ISIL advance, US must clarify Syria strategy
Obama has to have a strategy before he can clarify it.
*****************
Trust but Verify --- R Reagan
"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you."1 Thessalonians 5:14–18
Kevind53- Super Moderator
- Posts : 27254
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 24
Location : Umm right here!
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:51 am by Mission1st
» Dave Schmidt - Zim Notes for Purchase (NOT PHYSICAL NOTES)
Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:45 am by Mission1st
» Russia aren't taking any prisoners
Fri Apr 05, 2024 6:48 pm by kenlej
» Deadly stampede could affect Iraq’s World Cup hopes 1/19/23
Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:02 am by Ditartyn
» ZIGPLACE
Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:29 am by Zig
» CBD Vape Cartridges
Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:10 pm by Arendac
» Classic Tony is back
Tue Mar 05, 2024 2:53 pm by Mission1st
» THE MUSINGS OF A MADMAN
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:40 am by Arendac
» Minister of Transport: We do not have authority over any airport in Iraq
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:40 am by Verina
» Did Okie Die?
Mon Mar 04, 2024 11:34 am by Arendac
» Hello all, I’m new
Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:46 pm by Jonny_5
» The Renfrows: Prophets for Profits, Happy Anniversary!
Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:46 pm by Mission1st
» What Happens when Cancer is treated with Cannabis? VIDEO
Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:58 am by MadisonParrish
» An Awesome talk between Tucker and Russell Brand
Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:16 am by kenlej
» Trafficking in children
Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:43 pm by kenlej
» The second American Revolution has begun, God Bless Texas
Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:13 pm by kenlej
» The Global Currency Reset Evolution Event Will Begin With Gold, Zimbabwe ZWR Old Bank Notes
Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:28 pm by Mission1st
» Tucker talking Canada
Wed Jan 24, 2024 6:50 pm by kenlej
» Almost to the end The goodguys are winning
Mon Jan 22, 2024 9:03 pm by kenlej
» Dinar Daily Facebook Page
Mon Jan 22, 2024 3:34 pm by Ponee